XPost: can.politics, comp.os.linux.advocacy, or.politics
XPost: sac.politics, talk.politics.guns
From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca
In article ,
Tyler Coop wrote:
>On 26 Apr 2025, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted some
>news:vujes1$1d9n$2@gallifrey.nk.ca:
>
>> In article <25fq0k1jlvubo35m4lah3dmmagibvco3c2@4ax.com>,
>> Joel wrote:
>>>doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>>>>In article <8fcq0k5c7bs7uvje0fnqqrpfud9ba079ag@4ax.com>,
>>>>Joel wrote:
>>>>>pothead wrote:
>>>>>>On 2025-04-25, Joel wrote:
>>>>>>> slothe wrote:
>>>>>>>>On 25 Apr 2025, a425couple posted some
>>>>>>>>news:qiOOP.2639593$OrR5.2009332@fx18.iad:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Simply amazing!
>>>>>>>>> I want it all!
>>>>>>>>> I want it both ways!
>>>>>>>>> And I want all of you to pay for it!
>>>>>>>>> ---------- Court - OK, sounds fine to us.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>That's ridiculous.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They may have accidentally done the right thing. This particular
>>>>>>> surgery is just fucking insane but it seems to be the wish of the
>>>>>>> person acquiring it - I could never advise anyone to modify their
>>>>>>> genitals but if they choose that they choose with free will to
>>>>>>> pretend that God screwed up and it requires a knife to the balls.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Looks like the insult "go fu%k yourself" has taken on a whole new
>>>>>>meaning.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>ROTFLMAO!
>>>>>
>>>>>They would need a partner, not being able to use the penis to
>>>>>penetrate their own makeshift vagina. I say if a person is
>>>>>delusional enough to think they're bigender and should literally
>>>>>have surgery to have both parts, let them.
>>>>
>>>>What does this have to do with Canadian Politics?
>>>
>>>
>>>Are there not trans people in Canada, as it happens?
>>>
>>>--
>>>Joel W. Crump
>>>
>>>Amendment XIV
>>>Section 1.
>>>
>>>[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
>>>abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>>>United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
>>>life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
>>>nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
>>>protection of the laws.
>>>
>>>Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
>>>liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
>>
>> And US laws have no implication in Canada.
>
>It would be a better 51st candidate state if they did!
>
>You moose-kissers get a free pass for Marie-Pierre Bouchard
>because she's funny and looks good in a swimsuit.
>
burn in Hell Yank!
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Canada -Save the Nation from Donald Trump - Vote Liberal!
--- SoupGate-DOS v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
