XPost: can.politics, comp.os.linux.advocacy, or.politics   
   XPost: sac.politics, talk.politics.guns   
   From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca   
      
   In article <205053037b.1745698653@ydhzu.uq>,   
   Tyler Coop   wrote:   
   >On 26 Apr 2025, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted some   
   >news:vujdk3$1afr$14@gallifrey.nk.ca:   
   >   
   >> In article <8fcq0k5c7bs7uvje0fnqqrpfud9ba079ag@4ax.com>,   
   >> Joel   wrote:   
   >>>pothead  wrote:   
   >>>>On 2025-04-25, Joel  wrote:   
   >>>>> slothe  wrote:   
   >>>>>>On 25 Apr 2025, a425couple  posted some   
   >>>>>>news:qiOOP.2639593$OrR5.2009332@fx18.iad:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Simply amazing!   
   >>>>>>> I want it all!   
   >>>>>>> I want it both ways!   
   >>>>>>> And I want all of you to pay for it!   
   >>>>>>> ---------- Court - OK, sounds fine to us.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>That's ridiculous.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> They may have accidentally done the right thing.  This particular   
   >>>>> surgery is just fucking insane but it seems to be the wish of the   
   >>>>> person acquiring it - I could never advise anyone to modify their   
   >>>>> genitals but if they choose that they choose with free will to   
   >>>>> pretend that God screwed up and it requires a knife to the balls.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Looks like the insult "go fu%k yourself" has taken on a whole new   
   >>>>meaning.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>ROTFLMAO!   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>They would need a partner, not being able to use the penis to   
   >>>penetrate their own makeshift vagina.  I say if a person is delusional   
   >>>enough to think they're bigender and should literally have surgery to   
   >>>have both parts, let them.   
   >>>   
   >>>--   
   >>>Joel W. Crump   
   >>>   
   >>>Amendment XIV   
   >>>Section 1.   
   >>>   
   >>>[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall   
   >>>abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the   
   >>>United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of   
   >>>life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;   
   >>>nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal   
   >>>protection of the laws.   
   >>>   
   >>>Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are   
   >>>liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.   
   >>   
   >> What does this have to do with Canadian Politics?   
   >   
   >Ontario isn't part of Canada?  Let's nuke that LGBTIQA+ dump!   
   >   
      
   Yes, but the about Amendment is US Law.   
   --   
   Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca   
   Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!   
   Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;   
   Canada -Save the Nation from Donald Trump - Vote Liberal!   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)