XPost: can.politics, comp.os.linux.advocacy, or.politics
XPost: sac.politics, talk.politics.guns
From: tcoop@uraniumone.com
On 26 Apr 2025, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted some
news:vuk101$e9u$8@gallifrey.nk.ca:
> In article <205053037b.1745698653@ydhzu.uq>,
> Tyler Coop wrote:
>>On 26 Apr 2025, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted some
>>news:vujdk3$1afr$14@gallifrey.nk.ca:
>>
>>> In article <8fcq0k5c7bs7uvje0fnqqrpfud9ba079ag@4ax.com>,
>>> Joel wrote:
>>>>pothead wrote:
>>>>>On 2025-04-25, Joel wrote:
>>>>>> slothe wrote:
>>>>>>>On 25 Apr 2025, a425couple posted some
>>>>>>>news:qiOOP.2639593$OrR5.2009332@fx18.iad:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Simply amazing!
>>>>>>>> I want it all!
>>>>>>>> I want it both ways!
>>>>>>>> And I want all of you to pay for it!
>>>>>>>> ---------- Court - OK, sounds fine to us.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That's ridiculous.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They may have accidentally done the right thing. This particular
>>>>>> surgery is just fucking insane but it seems to be the wish of the
>>>>>> person acquiring it - I could never advise anyone to modify their
>>>>>> genitals but if they choose that they choose with free will to
>>>>>> pretend that God screwed up and it requires a knife to the balls.
>>>>>
>>>>>Looks like the insult "go fu%k yourself" has taken on a whole new
>>>>>meaning.
>>>>>
>>>>>ROTFLMAO!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>They would need a partner, not being able to use the penis to
>>>>penetrate their own makeshift vagina. I say if a person is
>>>>delusional enough to think they're bigender and should literally
>>>>have surgery to have both parts, let them.
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>Joel W. Crump
>>>>
>>>>Amendment XIV
>>>>Section 1.
>>>>
>>>>[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
>>>>abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>>>>United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
>>>>life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
>>>>nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
>>>>protection of the laws.
>>>>
>>>>Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
>>>>liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
>>>
>>> What does this have to do with Canadian Politics?
>>
>>Ontario isn't part of Canada? Let's nuke that LGBTIQA+ dump!
>>
>
> Yes, but the about Amendment is US Law.
Yes it is and it was finally corrected so the responsibility rests with
the states where it should have been all along.
Now, why doesn't Canada provide the roto-rooter but leave the penis
procedure? Why do they have to go to the US state of steers and queers?
--- SoupGate-DOS v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
