XPost: can.politics, comp.os.linux.advocacy, or.politics
XPost: sac.politics, talk.politics.guns
From: tcoop@uraniumone.com
On 26 Apr 2025, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted some
news:vuk11o$e9u$10@gallifrey.nk.ca:
> In article ,
> Tyler Coop wrote:
>>On 26 Apr 2025, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted some
>>news:vujes1$1d9n$2@gallifrey.nk.ca:
>>
>>> In article <25fq0k1jlvubo35m4lah3dmmagibvco3c2@4ax.com>,
>>> Joel wrote:
>>>>doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>>>>>In article <8fcq0k5c7bs7uvje0fnqqrpfud9ba079ag@4ax.com>,
>>>>>Joel wrote:
>>>>>>pothead wrote:
>>>>>>>On 2025-04-25, Joel wrote:
>>>>>>>> slothe wrote:
>>>>>>>>>On 25 Apr 2025, a425couple posted some
>>>>>>>>>news:qiOOP.2639593$OrR5.2009332@fx18.iad:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Simply amazing!
>>>>>>>>>> I want it all!
>>>>>>>>>> I want it both ways!
>>>>>>>>>> And I want all of you to pay for it!
>>>>>>>>>> ---------- Court - OK, sounds fine to us.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>That's ridiculous.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They may have accidentally done the right thing. This
>>>>>>>> particular surgery is just fucking insane but it seems to be
>>>>>>>> the wish of the person acquiring it - I could never advise
>>>>>>>> anyone to modify their genitals but if they choose that they
>>>>>>>> choose with free will to pretend that God screwed up and it
>>>>>>>> requires a knife to the balls.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Looks like the insult "go fu%k yourself" has taken on a whole new
>>>>>>>meaning.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>ROTFLMAO!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>They would need a partner, not being able to use the penis to
>>>>>>penetrate their own makeshift vagina. I say if a person is
>>>>>>delusional enough to think they're bigender and should literally
>>>>>>have surgery to have both parts, let them.
>>>>>
>>>>>What does this have to do with Canadian Politics?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Are there not trans people in Canada, as it happens?
>>>>
>>>>--
>>>>Joel W. Crump
>>>>
>>>>Amendment XIV
>>>>Section 1.
>>>>
>>>>[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
>>>>abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>>>>United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
>>>>life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
>>>>nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
>>>>protection of the laws.
>>>>
>>>>Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
>>>>liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
>>>
>>> And US laws have no implication in Canada.
>>
>>It would be a better 51st candidate state if they did!
>>
>>You moose-kissers get a free pass for Marie-Pierre Bouchard
>>because she's funny and looks good in a swimsuit.
>>
>
> burn in Hell Yank!
Throw in Marie wearing the pink bunny costume and I'll risk it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AZT84thPfkw
--- SoupGate-DOS v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
