Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    seattle.politics    |    Whats happening in the land of Nirvana    |    102,158 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 101,476 of 102,158    |
|    a425couple to All    |
|    =?UTF-8?Q?Deport_them_now!_-_Blackstone=    |
|    09 May 25 09:02:18    |
      [continued from previous message]              Harvard Law’s Noah Feldman has argued, even the Emancipation       Proclamation was likely unconstitutional. But it was certainly neither       unjust nor unwise.              Fortunately, key Trump officials are pushing back against the narrative       pushed by the Left and the castrated Right on this issue.              Trump’s Deputy Chief of Staff, Stephen Miller, long the president’s       point person on immigration, understood the situation much more clearly,       saying on X:              Biden imported 15M+ illegals in 4 years. Democrats believe each alien       should get a lengthy federal trial before being sent back. After we       scour the country to find them. Because they are all evading arrest. A       typical trial would take months to complete. Not counting appeals. This       would mean even if we shut down our entire federal court system to do       nothing else the process that the Democrats demand would take multiple       centuries to complete. Which Democrats understand. Because they don’t       want any aliens removed. They want them all registered—to vote. The       judicial process is for Americans. Immediate deportation is for illegal       aliens. If you break into someone’s house you don’t get to spend months       or years debating your presence. Trespassers must go. And they must go now.              A day later Vice President Vance, posting on X, doubled down in the same       fashion, making clear that he understood exactly what was at stake in       these cases.              To say the administration must observe “due process” is to beg the       question: what process is due is a function of our resources, the public       interest, the status of the accused, the proposed punishment, and so       many other factors.… Here’s a useful test: ask the people weeping over       the lack of due process what precisely they propose for dealing with       Biden’s millions and millions of illegals. And with reasonable resource       and administrative judge constraints, does their solution allow us to       deport at least a few million people per year? If the answer is no,       they’ve given their game away. They don’t want border security. They       don’t want us to deport the people who’ve come into our country       illegally. They want to accomplish through fake legal process what they       failed to accomplish politically.              Rule of law is indeed on trial — just not in the way that the Left       believes. The procedural antics the Left conveniently describes as “rule       of law” have now been exposed as a multi-decade scheme to nullify       elections and democratic choice — to get done through the power of “law”       what the Democrats cannot accomplish politically at the ballot box.       Until that changes, the GOP is absolutely correct to reject this       Democrat-enabling version of “rule of law” and the hapless       “conservative” establishment that has run cover for it.              Americans had no “due process” when Biden let in these millions of       illegals — often flying them into cities, including my own, in the dead       of night, while refusing to let citizens know what was happening. A       regime in which one party can import millions of people illegally       without resistance but the other party cannot restore order by deporting       these same illegals just as expeditiously is many things; but it is not       a democracy, and it does not have rule of law. This       Blackstone-for-morons attitude is just what Americans voted against in       electing Trump.              It is the typical bureaucrat’s mindset that process must always outweigh       substance. But if the supposedly neutral “rule of law” process       consistently delivers liberal results even against the wishes of voters,       we must challenge the legitimacy of the process itself.                     Jeremy Carl is a senior fellow at the Claremont Institute and a former       Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Interior under President Trump. His       book The Unprotected Class: How Anti-White Racism is Tearing America       Apart, has just been released by Regnery/Skyhorse Publishing.              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca