XPost: or.politics, talk.politics.guns, alt.law-enforcement   
   XPost: rec.aviation.military   
   From: nospam@ix.netcom.com   
      
   On 07 Jul 2025, a425couple  posted some   
   news:bZXaQ.182822$W5Jb.120947@fx09.iad:   
      
   > On 7/6/25 08:43, Baxter wrote:   
   >> Supreme Court just opened the door for the government to grab guns:   
   >> legal expert>   
   >>   
   >> "What if the next president, a Democrat president, for example, says,   
   >> 'I hereby issue an executive order: we're collecting all the guns.   
   >> We're collecting them all tomorrow, we're going house to house, and   
   >> we interpret the Constitution. The Second Amendment is saying, well,   
   >> we're only talking about militia. And that's, oh, I don't know, the   
   >> National Guard. Therefore, your AR-15 is now going to be collected by   
   >> our authorities.'"   
   >>   
   >> "Imagine the same thing," he suggested. "Someone would immediately go   
   >> to a district court to challenge that as unconstitutional and so now   
   >> what does this mean that we now need to wait for as the attorney   
   >> general or Solicitor General John Sauer said, for these cases to   
   >> percolate up through the system?"   
   >>   
   >> https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-just-opened-the-door-f   
   >> or- the-government-to-grab-guns-legal-expert/ar-AA1HytUf?ocid=EMMX   
   >   
   >   
   > Baxter is so ignorant and delusional.   
   >   
   > At worst, they might get to about 10 houses, in Blue states,   
   > before they were stopped in their tracks and had to accept   
   > reality.   
      
   In agreement there!  Despite other philosophical differences, reds and   
   blues tend to agree on the right to bear arms.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)