9a7937b1   
   XPost: soc.culture.china, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.british   
   XPost: soc.culture.iraq   
      
   On Mar 24, 5:26 pm, acous...@panix.com (lo yeeOn) wrote:   
   > In article ,   
   > bmo...@nyx.net  wrote:   
   > >On Mar 20, 5:47 pm, acous...@panix.com (lo yeeOn) wrote:   
   > >> Why did so many Iraqis have to die just because we see Saddam as a   
   > >> "monster"?   
   >   
   > >> An Iraqi in exile Karl Sharro @KarlreMarks said:   
   >   
   > >> The invasion of Iraq forced my entire family there to leave   
   > >> permanently and I don't know when will I see it again. Sorry for   
   > >> not cheering.   
   >   
   > >> Who are we, Americans and British under Bush and Blair, to tell Karl   
   > >> that he and his entire family should lose their home and their country   
   > >> just because we said Saddam was a "monster"?   
      
   I didn't say we should have invaded Iraq. I said Saddam was a monster,   
   and I am right.   
      
   > >You *don't* have any sanity.   
   >   
   > Hurling insults and non sequiturs in mid-sentence shows that you have   
   > no counter-argument.   
      
   Saddam was a monster. Go fuck yourself.   
      
   > >> we know that many accusations against Saddam   
   > >> are taken out of context.   
   >   
   > >This is why I ignore most of your blather. I have already stated that   
   > >the war wasn't "worth it". But you can't admit that Saddam was a   
   > >horror. You have stated that North Korea is a "proud nation" even as   
   > >the awful government is a parasite to its people.   
   >   
   > Just because you glibly 'stated that the war wasn't "worth it"'   
   > doesn't provide you a cover for providing continuing support for a   
   > government which is hell bent on making regime change in one nation   
   > after another and at the expense of innocent lives and destruction of   
   > Mother Earth.  I saw that you rushed out and posted a one liner that   
   > the war wasn't worth it to rst's original post and I immediately   
   > recognized your motive.   
      
   My one-liner was accurate, Your thousands of words are not.   
      
   > Everything you have posted here is of the genre of perpetuating the   
   > warmongers' refrain that there is a train of bogeymen in the world   
   > that we have to bring down under the guise of being a liberal and   
   > pretending that you knew right from wrong.   
   >   
   > But you are no different than John McCain and Lindsey Graham and   
   > George Bush and Tony Blair.   
   > You didn't say that it was wrong to attack a country under false   
   > pretenses.  You want to justify, after the fact, the act of the war   
   > and do so by pointing your fatty finger at Saddam and say "but he was   
   > a monster".   
      
   i didn't say that, you pseudo-intellectual.   
      
   Given your defense of not only Saddam, but Kadaffy and the North   
   Korean monsters, you deserve to have the shit beaten out of you.   
      
   It's true.   
      
   You will never come close to helping the world get more peaceful. You   
   are an arrogant SOB who is good with words but fast and loose with   
   facts.   
      
   I am done with you. What a fucking idiot you are.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)