From: dudaraster@gmail.com   
      
   SYRIA AND SYRIAN FINAL VICTORY AT THE UN: IS THAT THE CUBAN MISSILE CRISIS?   
   By Aviroce   
      
   Assume the conflict on Chemical Weapons in Syria exists between the United   
   States of America and Syria. The Russians are saying that Syria will abandon   
   its Chemical Weapons' stockpile and will not seek to manufacture or acquire   
   Chemical Weapons following    
   the Treaty on Chemical Weapons Prohibition.  Syria agrees to these   
   provisions.  But the United States of America goes one step ahead by requiring   
   that if Syria ever been accused of having Chemical Weapons then the United   
   States of America has the full    
   right and full support of the United Nations to basically demolish the Syrian   
   nation and take over the people and country.  It seems to me that the United   
   States of America is asking too much from the agreement not to attack Syria   
   under the pretext of    
   Chemical Weapons' stipulatations.  Even the Chemical Weapons' stipulation is   
   false as the rebels and Israel and possibly our Special Forces in Syria might   
   had done it to allow USA to have the upper hand.  This is similar to the Gulf   
   of Tonkin resolution    
   that ended with over Fifty-Five Thousands of USA troops killed, and millions   
   injured and an ever increasing overhaul of the United States of America   
   socially, politically and economically.   
      
   Let us face it.  Syria is desparate to stop the civil war to have peace within   
   the population and central control.  But that cannot happen by putting a   
   choker on Syria's neck with the United States of America holding the other end   
   of the choker to make    
   sure Syria cannot defend itself.  Afterall, any attack on Syria will be faced   
   by an attack on USA and USA interests directly including USA bases in Jordan,   
   Iraq, Afghanistan, and of course Israel.  When a nation is desparate to have   
   its freedom untouched    
   by foreigners, the nation can take the extra mile of "Kill or be Killed."  No   
   exit.  This would invite othere stakeholders to take action.  That is short of   
   saying WWIII.   
      
   What is acceptable and I believe the Syrians and Russian would entertain the   
   idea is "Hands off Syria."  Syria would give out all its Chemical Weapons to   
   the UN (another polite way to say given to USA) and USA would sign an   
   armistice treaty with Syria    
   never to interfere in Syrian affairs.  Since Israel is an ally of USA then   
   Israel and USA are one.  Consequently, Israel should return the Golan Heights   
   to Syria and abandon any plan to attack or interefer in the Syrian affairs.;    
   It sounds like the    
   Cuban Missile Crisis.  Yes.  Indeed.  Castro was guaranteed independence of   
   Cuba and Cuba never attacked USA and USA never attacked Cuba.  Just neighbors   
   with "Private Fence"  to keep neignbors apart and at peace.  Cuba built the   
   best education system    
   for its people and kept its people free from predatory actions of the Human   
   Ticks ( commonly called Jew Race) and USA.   
      
   The Syrian removal of Chemical Weapons should then be construed as an act of   
   mutualism to maintain freedom of Syria and prohibition of USA-Human Ticks'   
   aggression.   
      
   Otherwise, removal of Chemical Weapons from Syria means weakening Syria, much   
   like Libya's Khodaffy,to be followed by an invasion to destroy the country..    
   And that is not acceptable..  Let Hell be fanned to have a larger fire.   
      
   Aviroce   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)