Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.culture.afghanistan    |    Discussion of the Afghan society    |    13,576 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 11,877 of 13,576    |
|    lo yeeOn to akwfung@hotmail.com    |
|    Is a gigantic battleship like the USS Wa    |
|    13 Nov 13 09:59:43    |
      XPost: soc.culture.china, soc.culture.singapore, soc.culture.indian       XPost: soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.japan, soc.culture.korean       XPost: soc.culture.iraq       From: acoustic@panix.com              I think a natural question might be: Is a gigantic battleship like the       USS Washington better or even necessary for the rescue? And if so,       would there be enough room for battleships from the US, UK, Japan,       Russia, and China to all crowd into the Philippines today?               The US and UK have dispatched warships to the typhoon-ravaged        Philippines to help facilitate relief efforts. Japan is also set to        deploy troops to the country to aid affected areas gruesomely        described as a corpse-choked wasteland.               The US has deployed an aircraft carrier and several other naval        vessels to the Republic of the Philippines on Tuesday "to make best        speed" in order to provide humanitarian assistance and disaster        support, Pentagon Press Secretary George Little said.               The nuclear-powered carrier USS George Washington, which carries        5,000 sailors and more than 80 aircraft, will be accompanied by the        cruisers USS Antietam and USS Cowpens, as well as the destroyer USS        Mustin.              I think the "to make best speed" narrative is not genuine. I think       that rescue missions, especially during peacetime, should be properly       within the responsibility of the International Red Cross/Crescent. If       anything, the UN should have the money to build whatever resource is       necessary to tackle this kind of humanitarian disaster. The IRCC       should not be simply working in war zones like that in Syria,       especially when more devastating natural disasters are happening with       increasing frequency today. Humanitarian disaster rescue missions       should be a truly international effort - instead of being a voluntary       act from select individual countries.              I remember the early phase post-Fukushima disaster also saw the       involvement of the US military. But however heroic an effort it was,       it didn't do the job as it was require, as the problems arising from       the disaster were neither corrected nor contained.              When you have troops and battleships going into a natural disasters       area, you don't want a battleship that belongs to a country you are       diplomatically unfriendly to to also throw anchor nearby. Our troops       may trust the UK and Japanese troops; but they may easily pull the       trigger on the PLA soldiers had they also be around. So, the effort       of individual heroism by country necessarily contributes to a total       effort that is at the minimum subtractive, when e.g., good PLA       soldiers who are known for their morale and professionalism, aren't       able to also make a contribution.              Of course, a more cynical view is just that the simultaneous arrivals       of battleships from the US, UK, and Japan in the Philippines is mostly       a show of force, a joint declaration to reaffirm that "Asian Pivot       2013" means business, and that the alliance will unswervingly stand       together through thick and thin to confront that common enemy called       China!              Whether it is the former or the latter scenario, using battlegroup       carriers touted (just a few days ago) to be primed for technical       supremacy in battles (with China) and deploying troops is not such a       good rescue mission for the victims who are in dire need of all the       help they can get from under the merciless sky.              lo yeeOn              In article |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca