Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.culture.afghanistan    |    Discussion of the Afghan society    |    13,576 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 12,299 of 13,576    |
|    lo yeeOn to All    |
|    Asian, Latin-American, and African human    |
|    05 Feb 16 21:59:07    |
      XPost: soc.culture.china, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.african       XPost: soc.culture.iraq, soc.culture.latin-america, soc.culture.europe       XPost: rec.sport.tennis       From: acoustic@panix.com              It's not only a clear case of political persecution from the get go -       the scumbags in the UK and Sweden have already shown how politicized       the case is - the latest UN WGAD (Working Group on Arbitrary       Detention) vote further indicates the politics in the UK's treatment       of Assange.              The UN panel investigating the case included 5 member countries.       Among them, Australia was absent. Ukraine was the only dissenting       vote. It's easy to see the connection between Ukraine (as determined       by its current government) and the United States. It's also easy to       see that Australia, Julian Assange's own country, is a spineless       vassal state of the US.              Sweden is far from being a neutral country, considering how little       credibility the charge of rape against Assange has. One can just       compare the accusation against Assange with Virginia Roberts'       accusation against the UK's own philanderous prince and Juanita       Broaddrick's accusation against former US president Bill Clinton of       rape. Both President Clinton and Prince Andrew are sitting pretty,       apparently because they are on the side of power, while their victims       are summarily dismissed and ridiculed. Interestingly the two powerful       philanderers were frequent guests of a Jeffrey Epstein who is known to       have gainfully entertained powerful people like these biggest of the       big shots. And these biggest of the big variety apparently have to do       with the power behind them, which are the US government and the United       Kingdom, rather than the merit of their respective cases or their own       reputation.              The case against Assange is really disgusting! The United States       government is so keen to punish him for having exposed some of the       dirty deeds in connection with its own violent foreign policy that no       altitude is deemed too low and too murky for it to fly its gear       through in order to accomplish its goal. The US government has no       legal basis to charge Assange for his Wikileaks service. So, it uses       sleaze.              (From Wikileaks, we learned that the current civil war in Syria was       the work of the US State Department beginning as early as 2006, with       then Ambassador Robert Ford in charge of inciting a revolt. And from       the same service, we also learned about our military firing missiles       in broad daylight at unarmed and unsuspecting civilians in occupied       Iraq. The missile launcher was an aircraft sitting on the ground, in       a supposedly non-threatening position. And journalists were among the       victims.)              You see, Snowden would have been renditioned back to the US on a plane       standing by in Copenhagen had he been nabbed from his Airport       Shremetyevo refuge in Moscow. Denmark was ready to comply with what       Uncle Sam wanted it to do.              Now in the case of Julian Assange, it's not surprising that Sweden,       Asutralia, Ukraine, and the UK, all vassal states of the United       States, have fallen in line.              The members of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD)       consists of representatives from the ROK (South Korea), Mexico, Benin,       Australia, and Ukraine.              Notice that it is roughly one representative from each continent.       Also note that ROK and Mexico are not normally anti-US states. So, it       seems that human decency has prevailed in their decision. But it also       suggests that the Obama administration has decided that it wasn't       worth pressuring the ROK, Mexicao and Benin to do its bidding since       the UN group's decision won't impact on what the UK and Sweden will do       - which is to continue to do the bidding of Uncle Sam - and that's       just as good for Him.              But many salutations to the representatives from the ROK, Mexico, and       Benin for standing with justice and human decency.              lo yeeOn              Current Members of the UN's WGAD:              Mr. Seong-Phil Hong (Chair-Rapporteur) teaches international law,       human rights, and ethics in investment at Yonsei Law School as an       Associate professor while also leading the Asian Law Center. He serves       as an expert member of the Asian Council of Jurists of the Asia       Pacific Forum, the collectivity of the NHRIs in the region. He has       worked as a conciliator for the ICSID under the World Bank. On the       human rights campaign front, he has been actively engaged in the       advocacy activities, over the last 20 years with focus on such issues       as the North Korean human rights and the WW II enforced sexual slaves,       while also touching upon those of the responsibility of multinational       enterprises and the legal redress for historical injustices. He was       appointed to the Working Group in May 2014.              Mr. Jose Guevara (First Vice-Chair), has a Ph.D. in Human Rights from       the Carlos III University of Madrid. Is the author of numerous       professional publications, has lectured in various universities in       Mexico and abroad, and has extensive practical experience in the area       of human rights and international criminal law. Among its former       responsibilities Mr. Guevara was Deputy Ombudsman at Mexico City's       Human Rights Institution, Head of the Human Rights Programme at the       Universidad Iberoamericana, Latin America and Caribbean Coordinator       for the Coalition for the International Criminal Court and Deputy       Director General for Human Rights and Democracy at the Mexican       Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Has also served as Head of the Human       Rights Unit at the Ministry of the Interior and Minister responsible       for human rights issues at the Mexican Mission before the United       Nations Office at Geneva. Mr. Guevara became a member of the Working       Group on June 1st, 2014.              Mr. Setondji Roland Adjovi (Second Vice-Chair) holds a position of       Assistant Professor at Arcadia University where he teaches African       affairs, international law including human rights. In addition, he       designs study abroad opportunities in Africa for The College of Global       Studies, and coordinates its programmes in France. He is also visiting       scholar at Universite Paris II (2013-2015). He has previously worked       at the International Criminal Court (2006-2007) and at the       International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (2003-2006 and 2008-2009).       He is in the network set up by the African Foundation for       International Law and sits in the editorial committee of the African       Yearbook of International Law and that of the International Legal       Materials. He was appointed to the Working Group in May 2014.              Ms. Leigh Toomey provides expert advice in designing, implementing and       evaluating human rights and justice programs around the world. She has       gained extensive experience in leading and working in field-based              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca