XPost: rec.sport.tennis, soc.culture.china, soc.culture.usa   
   XPost: soc.culture.iraq, soc.culture.african, soc.culture.syria   
   XPost: soc.culture.latin-america   
   From: jdeluise@gmail.com   
      
   acoustic@panix.com (lo yeeOn) writes:   
      
   >   
   > "Seem" is perhaps the only word you can seek cover under.  In fact,   
   > all I ever talked about regarding Trump was what was already on the   
   > internet, particularly in regard to his unusual view on the subject of   
   > war and peace.   
      
   He says he's going to invade Syria and Iraq, take oil that isn't ours,   
   murder the families of terrorists, build a great wall, among many other   
   things.  Why shouldn't we take him at his word?   
      
   >   
   > I never said I knew Trump.  You're clearly making up the phrase "I   
   > know Trump" in order to confuse an unsuspecting reader.  It's an   
   > unjustified smear and unbecoming of someone from the R.S.T. group.   
      
   Indeed you did, right after you wrote a speech for him (LOL)...  So   
   here's the link for the "unsuspecting reader"   
      
   https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rec.sport.tennis/GE_b6AoiaIo/bbjB_Rd3CgAJ   
      
   Right after the speech you wrote for him, look at the second sentence,   
   beginning with "But I know Trump".   
      
     Now it may not be exactly like that.  But I know Trump, Trump is not a   
     deceptive person, like G W Bush or Hillary Clinton.   
      
   So if you know Trump, and Trump is not a deceptive person, why don't you   
   take his threats of violence at face value?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)