XPost: soc.culture.china, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.latin-america   
   XPost: soc.culture.iraq, soc.culture.african, soc.culture.syria   
   XPost: rec.sport.tennis   
   From: skriptis@post.t-com.hr   
      
   jdeluise  Wrote in message:   
   > acoustic@panix.com (lo yeeOn) writes:   
   >   
   >   
   >>   
   >> Everybody who wants to understand knows that Trump is not into the   
   >> neocon foreign intervention agenda, regardless how he responded to   
   >> Morning Joe in one hazy morning.   
   >   
   > Doesn't matter, he can only be judged on what he says and the way he   
   > carries himself.  Your imagination about what you think he will do   
   > (which is directly opposite of what he has said) and how he carries   
   > himself is irrelevant.  Doesn't matter how many paragraphs you write, or   
   > how many articles you post verbatim.   
   >   
   > Now if you wanted a non-interventionist you could have backed Sanders...   
   >   
      
      
   Lol.   
      
   1. Sanders is, or would be a fraud. He would have to compromise a   
    lot due to his 'socialist' label. And even though he would   
    probably push economically in his direction, the compromise would   
    come with the hawks when it comes to issues of international   
    policy. In short, nothing would change.   
      
   2. Trump offers the real substantial change. He's all heavy words,   
    and tough talking, but the core essence of his messages is   
    cooperating and making agreements. That you haven't heard from   
    Sanders. At least I haven't. I've heard his war mongering   
    attitudes on foreign policy. Trump otoh is not delegitemizing   
    China or Russia or any country for having its own interests. He   
    talks a lot about war trades and stuff, but from a position of a   
    fighter, and having US interests on his mind. Otoh war hawks   
    engage in lies, propaganda and are trying to bully the other   
    world powers and they attack smaller countries and kill people.   
    In simplistic words.   
      
   3. Interventionism is not bad per se, when done legally and for   
    the better of the world. There is nothing wrong in Trump wanting   
    to obliterate ISIS savages.   
   It's the criminal aggression against sovereign nations that is a   
    problem. Such criminal aggressions like war against Iraq  or   
    proxy war against Syria created ISIS in the first place. Up to   
    million lives have been lost because of those actions by criminal   
    western leaders.   
      
   Nazis were trialed and sentenced for various crimes, genocide,   
    crimes against humanity, crimes against peace, unlawful   
    aggression etc. In an ideal world, Bush, Cheney, Clintons,   
    Albreight, Rumsfeld, Blair, Sarkozy, Obama, Cameron and co would   
    be equally punished.   
      
   Madeline Albreight says she's ok with half a million of Iraqi   
    children dying because of her, and that's not a big deal, but   
    when Trump says he'd temporarily ban Muslims from entering US,   
    he's a racist?   
      
   It's a sick sick world.   
      
      
   Would it hurt you more if Whisper prevented me from selling you   
    life saving  medicine for your child who dies because of it, or   
    if you got a ban on entering Australia?   
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
   --   
      
      
   ----Android NewsGroup Reader----   
   http://usenet.sinaapp.com/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)