XPost: soc.culture.china, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.latin-america   
   XPost: soc.culture.iraq, soc.culture.syria, soc.culture.african   
   XPost: rec.spo\rt.tennis   
   From: acoustic@panix.com   
      
   In article ,   
   bmoore wrote:   
   >On Wednesday, December 28, 2016 at 3:19:21 PM UTC-8, lo yeeOn wrote:   
   >> In article <227f013e-cd7d-4a22-af74-81e7298a5372@googlegroups.com>,   
   >> bmoore wrote:   
   >> >On Tuesday, December 27, 2016 at 7:55:06 PM UTC-8, lo yeeOn wrote:   
   >> >[his typical tripe]   
   >>   
   >> The so-called "his typical tripe" is the crux of the argument for why   
   >> Snopes is wrong, from Julian Assange, Judge Napolitano, and others.   
   >>   
   >> How arrogant it is for someone like bmoore who has not a shred of an   
   >> argument to dismiss the hard work of these distinguished analysts of   
   >> the contemporary American political scene. These individuals have   
   >> earned the reputation that they much deserve: Seekers of truth with   
   >> impeccable credibility and ethics!   
   >>   
   >> >The WND article noted that Snopes argued that Hillary's negligence in   
   >> >letting weapons fall into the hands of ISIS is not the same thing as   
   >> >*selling* weapons to ISIS. This is of course true.   
   >> >   
   >> >lo yeeOn is either dishonest or stupid.   
   >>   
   >> Of course, it's bmoore's modus operandi in the SCC group to try to   
   >> discredit posts which do not agree with the neocon narrative.   
   >>   
   >> He thinks he can pull a fast one for the casual readers in the group.   
   >>   
   >> He thinks he can smear the messenger to kill the message. But he, as   
   >> always, has failed once again.   
   >>   
   >> And as always I only make claims that I have stuff to back it up with   
   >> in the same article that i post.   
   >>   
   >> The point for me to cite the WND article, including Snopes' lame   
   >> excuse for Hillary is to show that Snopes deliberately ignored the   
   >> long history of Hillary's clandestine involvement in arming ISIS   
   >> during her tenure as SoS. In fact, ignoring the context is a common   
   >> defense tactic for criminals like Hillary who made regime change the   
   >> focus of her State job and started out with the grotesque project to   
   >> overthrow the Gaddafi government in Libya and then shifted her regime   
   >> change human resources, aka, her mercenaries, along with the arms they   
   >> had used in the Libyan war, to Syria.   
   >>   
   >> I didn't have to do anything except to quote the WND article because   
   >> it details the context of Hillary's history of arming terrorists.   
   >>   
   >> It's clear why Snopes said things that would _appear_ to absolve   
   >> Hillary. It's, as WND pointed out, a "left-leaning" organization. It   
   >> didn't like Assange's revelations on Democracy Now and it of course   
   >> didn't like Assange's recent Christmas Eve interview with Repubblica's   
   >> Stefania Maurizi. So, even as Snopes cannot deny the fact that   
   >> weapons captured from fleeing ISIS fighters have the "made in the US"   
   >> label, it ignores all the ISIS supporting activities Hillary and her   
   >> staff were engaged in in those years that caused millions of Syrians   
   >> to be homeless and hundreds of thousands more to be killed.   
   >>   
   >> But WND made very careful documentation of what Judicial Watch, Judge   
   >> Napolitano have analyzed - through hundreds of pages of documents they   
   >> were able to uncover through the FOIA.   
   >>   
   >> Some of the most damning evidence that has come through was that the   
   >> late Ambassador Christopher Stevens was moving arms from group to   
   >> group in Libya to help Hillary accomplish what NATO could not do in   
   >> the air. And because of Stevens' interaction with ISIS, he was   
   >> eventually killed when ISIS attacked the US consulate in Benghazi.   
   >> ("If you lie down with a rattle snake you may get bitten", as the   
   >> proverb goes.) That tragedy was merely a point of illustration of the   
   >> dark side of regime change - using terrorists to overthrow governments.   
   >>   
   >> Julian Assange used much more diplomatic terms to describe this dark   
   >> stuff.   
   >>   
   >> "So, those Hillary Clinton emails, they connect together with the   
   >> cables that we have published of Hillary Clinton, creating a rich   
   >> picture of how Hillary Clinton performs in office, but, more   
   >> broadly, how the U.S. Department of State operates," Assange said in   
   >> the interview.   
   >>   
   >> "So, for example, the disastrous, absolutely disastrous intervention   
   >> in Libya, the destruction of the Gadhafi government, which led to   
   >> the occupation of ISIS of large segments of that country, weapons   
   >> flows going over to Syria, being pushed by Hillary Clinton, into   
   >> jihadists within Syria, including ISIS, that's there in those emails."   
   >>   
   >> And a former Obama administration DHS officer Philip Haney and WND   
   >> Editor Art Moore explained the administration's silence on the   
   >> Benghazi fiasco in "See Something, Say Nothing: A Homeland Security   
   >> Officer Exposes the Government's Submission to Jihad,"   
   >>   
   >> Turkish President Erdogan just revealed that the US was working with   
   >> ISIS in Syria.   
   >>   
   >> "They are supporting all the terror groups," Erdogan said. "It's   
   >> quite clear, perfectly obvious," he said, offering to provide proof   
   >> in pictures and video.   
   >>   
   >> And I specifically put Judge Napolitano's analysis at the top of my   
   >> post to show that Assange's revelation on Hillary's business in arming   
   >> ISIS is firmly backed up by the way our government has worked using   
   >> intelligence information to start a war against a country somewhere on   
   >> this planet - very sleazy and very secretive.   
   >>   
   >> [Judge] Napolitano explained that to use intelligence assets under   
   >> the war powers resolution, Clinton needed the cooperation and   
   >> informal consent of the "Congress within the Congress," referring to   
   >> the House Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee   
   >> on Intelligence, which are sworn to secrecy.   
   >>   
   >> "The result is the president of the United States, the secretary of   
   >> state and about two dozen people in the House and Senate, including   
   >> the leadership of both parties in both houses, can authorize a   
   >> clandestine war using CIA assets" he said.   
   >>   
   >> "And this is exactly what President Obama and Secretary Clinton   
   >> did."   
   >>   
   >> Having obtained the authorization of the House and Senate   
   >> intelligence committees, Clinton began a secret gun-running   
   >> operation to Libya, using a provision in the United Nations-imposed   
   >> arms embargo on Libya that allowed the foreign minister of   
   >> participating countries to grant an exception to the embargo,   
   >> Napolitano said [regarding the Turi arms smuggling case].   
   >>   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|