XPost: soc.culture.china, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.latin-america   
   XPost: soc.culture.iraq, soc.culture.african, soc.culture.europe   
   XPost: rec.sport.tennis   
   From: skriptis@post.t-com.hr   
      
   TT  Wrote in message:   
   > 6.1.2017, 1:37, *skriptis kirjoitti:   
   >> TT  Wrote in message:   
   >>> 5.1.2017, 23:38, *skriptis kirjoitti:   
   >>>> TT  Wrote in message:   
   >>>>> 5.1.2017, 22:06, *skriptis kirjoitti:   
   >>>>>> TT  Wrote in message:   
   >>>>>>> Warmonger?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> It's Putin who is the warmonger, occupying Ukraine and shooting down   
   >>>>>>> passenger planes.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Cretin.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Putinfucker.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You need to provide something to back up your lying accusations.   
   >>>>  No proof, no nothing, won't cut it.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> As for my assessment of you, I can provide your post that isn't   
   >>>>  backed up.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>> Everybody knows what has happened in Ukraine, it's not a matter of   
   >>> discussion. Tiresome stuff.   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Yeah, a coup, overthrowing democratically elected president, with   
   >>  e.g. John McCain parading Kiev streets, etc.   
   >>   
   >> Isn't he elected to take care of Arizona and not participate in   
   >>  deposing presidents he doesn't like?   
   >>   
   >   
   > It's not a coup when the police is shooting demonstrators and people   
   > rise against that. Those policemen btw fled to Russia.   
      
      
   Such an idiocy. I'd like to see e.g. US cops not shooting back   
    after they've been attacked and shot by "protesters".   
      
   Ukraine is of course a failed state, that's why it was possible   
    for violent gangs to bully the police. Otherwise such an obvious   
    19th century coup wouldn't have been possible.   
      
      
      
   > And why should we take anything you say seriously, you even argued that   
   > Putin wasn't involved in annexation of Crimea or East Ukraine.   
      
      
   That was before I found out he can install US president.   
      
   He has my attention now.   
      
      
      
   Joking aside, you see what a liar you are? East Ukraine isn't   
    annexed by Russia. Nor have I said Putin wasn't involved in   
    Crimea. I actually explained how such a move was asymmetrical   
    (unpredictable)  response to coup in Kiev. A tough guy's   
    response.   
      
   You know, it's Europe we're talking about, not Latin America, and   
    these aren't 1950s.   
      
      
   Putin says, ok since fair play is obviously no more, and since   
    they moved away from mere bribing or influencing corrupt   
    politicians which is kinda "acceptable" to actually deposing   
    democratic leaders that are close to us, we aren't bound by fair   
    play either.   
      
   We might as well return Russian populated Crimea and be done with   
    uncertainty regarding our more than two century old key naval   
    base there.   
      
      
   Now why that makes you unhappy?   
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
   --   
      
      
   ----Android NewsGroup Reader----   
   http://usenet.sinaapp.com/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)