XPost: rec.sport.tennis, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.china   
   XPost: soc.culture.latin-america, soc.culture.african, soc.culture.iraq   
   XPost: soc.culture.iranian   
   From: skriptis@post.t-com.hr   
      
   TT Wrote in message:   
   > 17.2.2017, 7:11, lo yeeOn kirjoitti:   
   >> In article ,   
   >> Brian W Lawrence wrote:   
   >>> On 16/02/2017 19:57, *skriptis wrote:   
   >>>> Brian W Lawrence Wrote in message:   
   >>>>> On 16/02/2017 11:56, *skriptis wrote:   
   >>>>>> Brian W Lawrence Wrote in message:   
   >>>>>>> On 16/02/2017 08:52, TT wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> 16.2.2017, 1:20, The Iceberg kirjoitti:   
   >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, 15 February 2017 20:01:02 UTC, *skriptis wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> TT Wrote in message:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> 15.2.2017, 18:24, *skriptis kirjoitti:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Russia to US is not a hostile power.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Russia is hostile power to everyone. Even its own citizens.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> You disgust me.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Russia is a hostile power to everyone. Even its own citizen.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Wow, really factual and unbiased.   
   >>>>>>>>>> LOL   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> I knew it all the time, but now it's clear to everyone.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> we've had Iraq, Syria, Libya, secret Yemen war and trying to kill   
   >>>>>>>>> Castro 600 times but Russia is hostile!   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> False equivalence.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> 600 times? They should have sent Bronson. (The Mechanic)   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Most of those were simply mad suggestions made by Cuban exiles or   
   >>>>>>> dissidents still in Cuba. The CIA may have offered some encouragement,   
   >>>>>>> including maybe cash, but they were mostly figments of someone's   
   >>>>>>> imagination.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> The Soviet Union/Russia has been 'hostile' to most other countries   
   since   
   >>>>>>> the revolution. It did have communist 'friends', but it enforced the   
   >>>>>>> friendship on its own terms. Since ~1992 Russia has seemingly   
   diminished   
   >>>>>>> in power and influence and is trying to reimpose its will on its   
   >>>>>>> neighbours and perceived 'enemies'.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> And yet Trump seems unaware of the history. I read/heard that he thinks   
   >>>>>>> Russia will return the Crimea to Ukraine, but the Kremlin also saw that   
   >>>>>>> and said 'not going to happen'.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Is UK going to give back Falklands?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> No, but why is that relevant or remotely similar?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I'm not surprised you don't see any similarities. You'd post   
   >>>> different stuff and think entirely differently if you were able   
   >>>> to analyze and compare events in unbiased way. As it is, you're   
   >>>> indoctrinated.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Therefore any attempt to explain it to you, would be in vain. Futile.   
   >>>   
   >>> Well for once you are right, it would be futile. Maybe you could educate   
   >>> our other readers though, I'm sure they'd enjoy that.   
   >>>   
   >>> Projection?   
   >>   
   >> >>>> Is UK going to give back Falklands?   
   >> >>>   
   >> >>> No, but why is that relevant or remotely similar?   
   >>   
   >> For the sake of peace :), I'll take a stab.   
   >>   
   >> Falkands' residents are overwhelmingly British. And upwards of 80   
   >> percent of residents in Crimea are either Russians or have Russian   
   >> relatives. And an overwhelming majority of Crimean residents want to   
   >> associate with Russia,   
   >   
   > Not true.   
   >   
   >> Crimea is historically and culturally Russian.   
   >   
   > Certainly Ukrainian geographically.   
   > Historically all over the map.   
   >   
   >   
   >> Finally, the Kerch Strait bridge project shows great care from Russia   
   >> to Crimea.   
   >   
   > Nonsense   
      
      
      
   You're a first class dumbass.   
      
   You can "perhaps" criticize Russia's action from a anti-war & a   
    hippie stance and that's all. Are you a hippie? That's for teens   
    and drug addicts.   
      
   I thought you were more normal than that.   
      
   You can't even criticize Russia from a deluded leftist,   
    anti-imperialist stance, as their action, was done as a response   
    to Ukrainian coup and on their border. It concerns their country.   
    They haven't sailed to the other side of the world to conduct   
    that action. So it's not even an imperialism.   
      
      
   And one more thing. Aren't you ashamed of lying so much?   
      
   Overwhelming majority or Crimeans don't want to be in Russia? Are   
    you idiot or what?   
   It's like saying British people living in Gibraltar don't want to   
    be part of UK.   
      
   Russians are the majority there. You're suggesting Russians don't   
    want to live in Russia? You're a drug addict, no doubt.   
      
      
   Even most of the non Russians there prefer Russia as a stable and   
    more lawful country over failed Ukraine. Just as Puerto Rico   
    Latinos would rather be part of USA over Mexico, even though they   
    aren't Anglosaxons.   
      
      
   And what's that response to Russia building a bridge to Crimea?   
    You say nonsense?   
   Nonsense as in, you don't believe the bridge is being built or   
    what, the project is a nonsense to you?   
      
   You're a total wacko.   
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
   --   
      
      
   ----Android NewsGroup Reader----   
   http://usenet.sinaapp.com/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|