home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   soc.culture.afghanistan      Discussion of the Afghan society      13,576 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 12,633 of 13,576   
   lo yeeOn to bmoore@nyx.net   
   Re: McCain is really too old to be an ef   
   11 May 17 05:19:54   
   
   XPost: soc.culture.china, soc.culture.usa, soc.culture.german   
   XPost: soc.culture.russian, soc.culture.syria, soc.culture.iraq   
   XPost: rec.sport.tennis   
   From: acoustic@panix.com   
      
   In article ,   
     wrote:   
   >On Wednesday, May 10, 2017 at 9:18:24 PM UTC-7, lo yeeOn wrote:   
   >> "THAAD is here to protect South Korea, why do you oppose it?" CBS's   
   >>   Diaz asked.   
   >>   
   >>   "The only reason America deployed THAAD here is to dominate Asia,"   
   >>   another [South Korean] man said. "America's presence here only   
   >>   raises the threat of war."   
   >>   
   >> Please know that the Koreans, from the south or the north, aren't   
   >> little copies of Red Riding Hood.  They aren't stupid.  There is   
   >> nothing about their country or its history that you know and they   
   >> don't know themselves.   
   >   
   >There's been no mention of Korea in this thread until now. You are   
   >really weird.   
      
   You're weird yourself by thinking that people don't know the two of   
   your are in consort to smear President Trump.  From day one, jdeluise   
   was referring to Trump the candidate with his "rug", disregarding his   
   message.   
      
   Of course, the Korean thing is connected to the other things that   
   McCain advocates.  There isn't a war that McCain doesn't like.  I   
   don't have to mention everything in one post.  But if you ignore the   
   original message, then it's time to hear some more of the unpatriotic   
   things that McCain has been doing to America.   
      
   lo yeeOn   
      
   >> For more of my rebuttal to jdeluise's ad hominem, please continue   
   to read.   
   >   
   >But if you want it to make any sense you'll need to smoke a lot of weed.   
   >   
   >Wow.   
      
   Of course, I made sense and I always try my best to make sense.  But   
   if President Trump invited Lavrov to meet him at the Oval Office and   
   the NYT called it a meeting at an awkward time, then it would be just   
   like you to throw that kind of ad hominem at me.  Just because you   
   said "Wow" doesn't mean that message wasn't clear.   
      
   But with respect to your tactics, I am used to it.  Don't forget that   
   you were trying to incite people to physically harm me because in my   
   posts, I asked why hundreds of thousands of Iraqis should die just   
   because we said their president was bad.  Do you want me to repost   
   your violent message?   
      
   And what kind of person are you, really, when the politicians are   
   threatening the extinction of the Korean people and you are attacking   
   the messenger who object to their callous act?   
      
   lo yeeOn   
      
   PS: My original reply was misterioiusly gone, leaving bmoore's ad   
   hominem - so weird!  So, this was that post that got deleted:   
      
   Subject: Re: McCain is really too old to be an effective senator -   
   someone who read too many Kafkaesque stories about centipedes, watched   
   too many Saturday Night Massacre movies, and confused Nixon's special   
   prosecutor with an FBI director   
      
     "THAAD is here to protect South Korea, why do you oppose it?" CBS's   
     Diaz asked.   
      
     "The only reason America deployed THAAD here is to dominate Asia,"   
     another [South Korean] man said. "America's presence here only   
     raises the threat of war."   
      
   Please know that the Koreans, from the south or the north, aren't   
   little copies of Red Riding Hood.  They aren't stupid.  There is   
   nothing about their country or its history that you know and they   
   don't know themselves.  For more of my rebuttal to jdeluise's ad   
   hominem, please continue to read.   
      
   In article ,   
   jdeluise   wrote:   
   >On Wed, 10 May 2017 21:44:59 +0000, lo yeeOn wrote:   
   >   
   >> I personally also do not believe the FBI's conclusion on 9/11.  I   
   >> believe that I am far from being alone since the term "truthers" has   
   >> long been around even before I started posting on these newsgroups.   
   >   
   >As have the moon landing deniers, holocaust deniers, etc.  Your   
   >chronology on usenet (you are a bad usenet citizen by the way) is   
   >irrelevant.   
      
   Well, what do you know?   
      
   Jdeluise is as grumpy as McCain when Trump gives the neocons and the   
   Deep State guardians the finger!   
      
   You've got to wonder why?   
      
   To me and many truthers, 9/11 was only an excuse to launch the PNAC   
   sub-projects; certainly no official report has much verifiability.   
      
   It's pretty clear to me first of all that McCain is up to no good by   
   badmouthing the head of state of America in front of a bunch of   
   Germans at this weird "Munich Security Conference core group".   
      
   Mike Flynn can't talk with the Russian ambassador but McCain can speak   
   ill of the president before a bunch of foreigners?  How strange!   
      
   So, McCain is exactly the no-good type that my subject line expressed   
   - and as a good citizen, it is my duty to use my free speech rights to   
   say that and I'm for peace and for making America great again.   
      
   Furthermore, by spreading an inappropriate, non-parallel comparison   
   between the firing of Comey with the firing of Archibald Cox, he is   
   guilty of smearing.  The foreigners most likely didn't know that   
   Archibld Cox wasn't an FBI director.  To a majority of Americans in   
   Nixon's day, firing Cox was bad but to the majority of today's   
   Americans, firing Comey is good - good for Trump followers and good   
   for Hillary's supporters, at least.   
      
   To me, and to many truthers, the FBI report does not convince.   
      
   All it did was to whip up a war fervor, giving George W Bush a blank   
   check to kill Muslims, and bring disaster to others (see below).   
      
   The official conclusion (re 9/11) is illogical and against physics,   
   about which I'll let the structural engineers and the physicists   
   explain with their detailed explanation accompanied with photos,   
   simulations, and calculations.  Why should the official line on 9/11   
   be any more trustworthy than the official line about Iraq's   
   non-existent WMD was?   
      
   The PNAC embraced by George W Bush and many of his key officials as   
   well as by Bush's brother is about regime change in the Middle East   
   and containment of Russia and China.   
      
   They don't give a damn about people's lives.   
      
   They claimed Iraq had a bad guy in charge, they went in and purged all   
   the Baathists and made not only the lives of the Sunni Iraqis   
   miserable, but also the rest of the people of the former Iraq under   
   Saddam.  This includes Christians as well, such as the ancienct   
   community of ASsyrian Christians.  How dare Bush claim to be a   
   Christian?  And I refer to the "former Iraq" because Kurdish leader   
   Barzani has told the Italians recently that Iraq no longer exists.   
   So, we destroyed Iraq.   
      
   And we went on to destroy Libya and Syria, and now Yemen.   
      
   Of course, we are stuck in the Afghan quagmire - a place known as   
   empires' graveyard, as you well know.   
      
   Yet, McCain as well as former UN ambassador Bolton who sold the Iraq   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca