Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.culture.germany    |    More than just Kraftwerk and Hasselhoff    |    611 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 128 of 611    |
|    Zorlak Oortbert to All    |
|    MUSLIMS in Europe - not integrating.    |
|    21 Jan 04 21:51:17    |
      XPost: alt.religion.islam, soc.culture.canada, soc.culture.british       XPost: soc.culture.france       From: zorlak@praisezorlak.com              Dutch are 'polarised' says report              By Angus Roxburgh       BBC News Online, Amsterdam              The Netherlands' example as a successful, tolerant, multicultural community       has taken a dent with the publication of a parliamentary report saying Dutch       society is becoming increasingly polarised, with huge ethnic ghettos and       subcultures tearing the country apart.              It is an issue which has been simmering away for years, but only made the       headlines two years ago when the radical politician Pim Fortuyn, who was       later assassinated, called for an end to immigration.              He said immigration, especially from Muslim countries, was diluting Dutch       liberal values.                     The increase in the number of Muslims is raising concerns in some countries.              Now the all-party parliamentary report has reached a similar conclusion. It       says the attempt to create an integrated multi-ethnic society has failed.              While most immigrants had integrated well, it said, there were also growing       ghettos of foreigners from countries such as Turkey and Morocco.              Even Dutch-born "foreigners" tend to marry within their own communities and       find spouses in their parents' home countries.              The report blamed successive Dutch governments for what had previously been       seen as a positive policy designed to make life easier for immigrants -       allowing them to be taught in their native languages at primary school.              This had merely perpetuated their alienation and prevented them from       integrating into Dutch society properly, it said.              In what would mark a reversal of a 30-year-old policy, the report       recommended that the country's Muslims should henceforth effectively "become       Dutch".              Dutch test              The city of Rotterdam, where almost half the population is of non-Dutch       origin (and where Mr Fortuyn had his biggest following), has already       pre-empted the report by bringing in measures to prevent the influx of more       immigrants.              At the end of last year it sought to keep out poor immigrants by stipulating       that newcomers must earn 20% more than the minimum wage. All applicants for       a residence permit would have to demonstrate a good command of Dutch.              And no more political refugees would be accepted for four years.              Although the Dutch report deals broadly with "immigrants" and their effect       on Dutch society, there is no doubt that it is Muslim immigrants who are       seen as posing the biggest problem.              In this, there are similarities with France, where current moves to ban       "religious symbols" in schools and public places are aimed primarily at       banning the headscarf worn by many Muslim women.              Opinion surveys all over Europe have detected growing public distrust of       Islam in the two years since the 11 September attacks on New York and       Washington.              The US-led "war on terror" has been largely aimed at Islamist groups,       inadvertently encouraging public perceptions of Muslims as being       "incompatible" with Western society.              In the Netherlands (and elsewhere) there is talk of trying to create a       "European" form of Islam - basically a secularised version, where private       religious beliefs are tolerated but not any manifestations of Islam which       undermine European laws and customs.              Integration              There is now a lively debate across Europe over whether assimilation or       integration or multiculturalism is the most desirable way forward.              Holland seems to be lurching from the multicultural option - in which       immigrants keep their own languages and cultures, at the risk of becoming       ghettoised - to a policy of assimilation, by which newcomers lose all trace       of their original identity and become indistinguishable from their "host"       nation other than by the colour of their skin.              In the middle is the option of integration - practised with some success in       the UK - whereby immigrants retain their distinct cultures but are also       encouraged to become part of the general community.              With Belgium now also considering a headscarf ban, there appears to be a       growing trend towards assimilation. It's a process that's already caused a       storm among Islamic communities in Europe and abroad, and may be fraught       with as many problems as the "opposite" policy of multiculturalism.              Trevor Phillips, chairman of the UK's Commission for Racial Equality, says       the real enemy of integration is inequality: "The more we keep people       unequal, the more they are likely to say, 'This society doesn't want us, it       discriminates against us,' (and) they fall into the hands of extremists."              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca