Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.culture.germany    |    More than just Kraftwerk and Hasselhoff    |    611 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 130 of 611    |
|    Charles Martell to All    |
|    Dutch fed up with scum-sucking Muslims    |
|    11 Feb 04 20:36:45    |
      XPost: alt.religion.islam, soc.culture.canada       From: crusader@crusader.com              Rotterdam refuses to take in any more refugees. The city authorities say the       influx of underprivileged newcomers is placing too heavy a burden on the       port's poorer districts. The move flies in the face of national government       policy, which is aimed at spreading new migrants across the country.       Nevertheless, Parliament says itīs willing to consider Rotterdam's       objections.              Foreign migrants will make up 70 percent of the Rotterdam population by 2017       if current policy remains unchanged. The forecast, by the Rotterdam Centre       for Research and Statistics, has sparked concern among city officials. They       argue that many of the newcomers are low-skilled and low-educated and       therefore end up in districts that are already facing serious social       problems. The Rotterdam authorities are preparing an action plan to "tackle       the accumulation of social and economic problems in certain       areas."Signalling one of the key measures that are set to be included in the       plan, Rotterdam's integration councillor, Sjaak van der Tak, has said the       city should no longer house any more asylum seekers, not even if they have       official refugee status:              "Already, Rotterdam has done 20 times as much as other major cities in the       Netherlands. We feel enough is enough, and that's why we're asking the       national government to spare us."              Equal share       Dutch municipalities are obliged to take in a specific number of refugees       who've been granted residence permits according to a formula set by the       national government. Rotterdam should meet its obligations, stresses       Immigration and Integration Minister Rita Verdonk.              But a majority with the Lower House of Parliament feels the government also       has an obligation to ensure that the refugees are in fact spread across the       country as planned. In the present situation, refugees often reject       accommodation offered to them in the countryside. They prefer to live in       urban areas, where they have relatives and friends and more services at       hand.              Integration Minister Verdonk has suggested other ways to create more space:              "I would say: just look at the number of illegal migrants still in the city,       people whose asylum applications have been turned down, but are still       occupying homes where they no longer belong. Just start enforcing deporting       them and there'll be plenty of room."              Tougher policies       The Dutch Immigration Ministry recently reported that just over 4,300 people       requested asylum in the Netherlands between May and August of this year, a       decrease of 17 percent compared with the previous four months.              Owing to tougher legislation, the number of requests for asylum decreased by       50 percent last year. Many asylum centres have since closed their doors.                            The statement sums up current government policy: taking in fewer asylum       seekers, offering proper accommodation to those already in the country and       sending back those whose asylum requests are rejected to the countries they       come from. But for the implementation of this policy, the integration       minister needs the cooperation of municipalities. And that's what has been       lacking, much to Mrs Verdonk's frustration.              Late 2002, the Justice Minister and the Association of Netherlands       Municipalities agreed that the municipalities would no longer have to       accommodate rejected asylum seekers. As of June this year, that would be the       national government's responsibility. Two large deportation centres were set       up: at Amsterdam's Schiphol Airport and at Zestienhoven Airport in       Rotterdam, offering a total of 600 cells. But not nearly that number have       been finished yet and this had prompted the municipal governments to take       the accommodation issue into their own hands.              Passing the buck       They fear that asylum seekers who have exhausted their appeals will       otherwise end up with entrenched illegal status. For that reason, the       western town of Noordwijk is spending 200,000 euros on food and housing each       year. Likewise, the southern city of 's-Hertogenbosch has started handing       out special identity cards that give illegal immigrants the right to a free       bed and meal. But Rotterdam will not copy their example. In fact, the four       major cities in the Netherlands have agreed to stick to national policy       tasking the ministry in The Hague to provide accommodation. The flip side of       this decision for Rotterdam is that it's losing track of the number of       rejected asylum seekers.              Rotterdam is now drawing national attention to the problem, but the solution       it offers doesn't seem justified. How can you deny foreigners with residence       permits the right to live where they want? While trying to solve the       problem, Integration Minister Rita Verdonk merely touches on another: the       group of illegal immigrants who have no right to stay in urban areas, but       are not deported. Pointing the accusing finger at each may be the easy       option, but it will benefit no one in the end.              http://www.rnw.nl/hotspots/html/dut031112.html              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca