Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.culture.germany    |    More than just Kraftwerk and Hasselhoff    |    612 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 133 of 612    |
|    pedro martori to All    |
|    China's thirst for oil poses threat to U    |
|    15 Feb 04 01:22:29    |
      XPost: soc.culture.cuba, soc.culture.france, soc.culture.italian       XPost: soc.culture.italy       From: pedro1940@progression.net               China's thirst for oil poses threat to U.S.               By Gal Luft | Special to Los Angeles Times                        Sixty-seven years ago, oil-starved Japan embarked on an aggressive       expansionary policy designed to secure its growing energy needs, which       eventually led the nation into a world war. Today, another Asian power thirsts       for oil: China.               While the United States is absorbed in fighting the war on terror, the seeds       of what could be the next world war are quietly germinating. With 1.3 billion       people and an economy growing at a phenomenal 8 percent to 10 percent a year,       China, already a        net oil importer, is growing increasingly dependent on imported oil. Last       year, its auto sales grew 70 percent and its oil imports were up 30 percent       from the previous year, making it the world's No. 2 petroleum user after the       United States. By 2030,        China is expected to have more cars than the United States and import as much       oil as the U.S. does today.               Dependence on oil means dependence on the Middle East, home to 70 percent of       the world's proven reserves. With 60 percent of its oil imports coming from       the Middle East, China can no longer afford to sit on the sidelines of the       tumultuous region. Its        way of forming a footprint in the Middle East has been through providing       technology and components for weapons of mass destruction and their delivery       systems to unsavory regimes in places such as Iran, Iraq and Syria. A report       by the U.S.-China Economic        and Security Review Commission, a group created by Congress to monitor       U.S.-China relations, warned in 2002 that "this arms trafficking to these       regimes presents an increasing threat to U.S. security interests in the Middle       East." The report concludes: "       A key driver in China's relations with terrorist-sponsoring governments is its       dependence on foreign oil to fuel its economic development. This dependency is       expected to increase over the coming decade."               Optimists claim that the world oil market will be able to accommodate China       and that, instead of conflict, China's thirst could create mutual desire for       stability in the Middle East and thus actually bring Beijing closer to the       United States.               History shows the opposite: Superpowers find it difficult to coexist while       competing over scarce resources. The main bone of contention probably will       revolve around China's relations with Saudi Arabia, home to a quarter of the       world's oil. The Chinese        have already supplied the Saudis with intermediate-range ballistic missiles,       and they played a major role 20 years ago in a Saudi-financed Pakistani       nuclear effort that may one day leave a nuclear weapon in the hands of a       Taliban-type regime in Riyadh or        Islamabad.               Since 9-11, a deep tension in U.S.-Saudi relations has provided the Chinese       with an opportunity to win the heart of the House of Saud. The Saudis hear the       voices in the United States denouncing Saudi Arabia as a "kernel of evil" and       proposing that the        United States seize and occupy the kingdom's oil fields. The Saudis especially       fear that if their citizens again perpetrate a terror attack in the United       States, there would be no alternative for the U.S. but to terminate its       long-standing commitment to        the monarchy -- and perhaps even use military force against it.               The Saudis realize that to forestall such a scenario they can no longer rely       solely on the United States to defend the regime and must diversify their       security portfolio. In their search for a new patron, they might find China       the most fitting and        willing candidate.               The risk of Beijing's emerging as a competitor for influence in the Middle       East and a Saudi shift of allegiance are things Washington should consider as       it defines its objectives and priorities in the 21st century. Without a       comprehensive strategy        designed to prevent China from becoming an oil consumer on a par with the       United States, a superpower collision is in the cards. The good news is that       we are still in a position to halt China's slide into total dependency.               Unlike the United States, China's energy infrastructure is largely       underdeveloped and primarily coal-based. It has not yet invested in a       multibillion-dollar oil infrastructure. China is therefore in a better       position than the United States to bypass        oil in favor of next-generation fuels.               The United States should embark on a frank dialogue with China, conveying to       the Chinese the mutual benefits of circumventing oil and offering any       assistance required to curb China's growing appetite for it. A shift from oil       into other sources of        transportation energy -- such as bio-fuels or coal-based fuels, hydrogen and       natural gas -- could prevent future conflict and foster unprecedented       Sino-American cooperation with significant economic benefits for both       countries.               The Chinese would probably leapfrog oil if they could. Dependency of any       kind is foreign to their culture. But without substantial American       technological support, China is likely to follow the path of least resistance       and become a full-fledged oil        economy. Failure to address the issue with the utmost care would undercut all       of today's costly efforts by the United States to reform and stabilize the       Middle East.               This explosive, complex region cannot accommodate two major powers competing       not only over a barrel but also over the hearts, minds and allegiance of its       people.               Gal Luft, executive director of the Institute for the Analysis of Global       Security and publisher of the online publication Energy Security, wrote this       commentary for the Los Angeles Times, a Tribune Publishing newspaper.                      lavozdecubalibre.com                            ---       Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.       Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).       Version: 6.0.573 / Virus Database: 363 - Release Date: 1/29/2004              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca