From: d@d.d   
      
   Hello,   
      
      
   I have extended my post a little bit, you can read it again:   
      
      
   More political philosophy about political correctness..   
      
   Now in political philosophy can we ask the question of:   
      
   Do we have to be political correctness or not ?   
      
   I think to be smart you have to define political correctness..   
      
   So then can we in political philosophy ask what is political correctness ?   
      
   I think that you have to know about morality to be able to answer this   
   question, and you will notice in my logical proof below that i think a   
   correct abstraction of what is morality is: "perfection at best", so why   
   i am choosing such abstraction  ? because we have to be perfection in   
   action by also being an effort of being more perfection, so then you are   
   noticing that morality must be pushed forward towards absolute   
   perfection, but perfection at best is also that we can for example say:   
   Perfection is perfection of not helping the weakest members of our   
   society and it is also perfection of helping the weakest members of the   
   society, and we can notice that each side has a weight of importance,   
   since we can not say that helping the weakest members of the society has   
   no importance, because it is also a perfection that has a weight of   
   importance, and logically we have not to neglect it, and as you have   
   noticed that i also said that: "Independently" of Democracy, we can say   
   that my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a   
   difficulty or with an effort of being more perfection that brings   
   satisfaction, so then now you are noticing that morality is also this   
   effort of helping others and it is also perfection in action towards   
   absolute perfection that is absolute happiness, so then you are noticing   
   that independently of democracy we can now notice that morality is also   
   this act of balancing between perfection of helping others and   
   perfection of moving forward towards absolute perfection that is   
   absolute happiness, and now you are noticing that when you look at today   
   world you are feeling that our today world is converging fast towards   
   this essence of morality of human beings, and now you are finally   
   noticing that you are able to see that this essence of morality   
   also dictates to us a kind of political correctness.  So read the rest   
   of my previous thoughts of my political philosophy to understand   
   more:   
      
      
      
   More about compassion in political philosophy..   
      
   And what about compassion in political philosophy ?   
      
   "Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More   
   perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an   
   effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction, and you have   
   noticed that i said the following so that to abstract it:   
      
   "When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and   
   eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being   
   this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan   
   couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes   
   with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to   
   prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient   
   philosophy. And it is also my spirit."   
      
   So then compassion is also "mechanical" that comes from my Rule of:   
   "More perfection brings satisfaction", since perfection is also   
   helping others, so then a more appropriate morality is to not neglect   
   helping others and to know how to help others.   
      
   So you are noticing that i am saying: "since perfection is also helping   
   others"   
      
   But i have to logically explain the big picture, here is how:   
      
   Since we can for example say: Perfection is perfection of not helping   
   the weakest members of our society and it is also perfection of helping   
   the weakest members of the society, and we can notice that each side has   
   a weight of importance, since we can not say that helping the weakest   
   members of the society has no importance, because it is also a   
   perfection that has a weight of importance, and logically we have not to   
   neglect it, and as you have noticed that i also said that:   
   "Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More   
   perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an   
   effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction.   
      
      
   More political philosophy of: What is morality ?   
      
   Am i crazy by saying that you have to follow my Rule of: "More   
   perfection brings satisfaction" ?   
      
   No, i am not crazy , since i am like a wise man type of person, so   
   i will explain more:   
      
   When i say that you have to follow the Rule of:   
      
   ""More perfection brings satisfaction"   
      
      
   You have to understand that i have abstracted the definition of morality   
   to: "Perfection at best" (read my proof below of it), and the "at best"   
   must be defined more, and you will notice in my below writing that   
   i have defined more what is the "at best" of "perfection at best" so   
   that you understand that morality is the act of perfectionning at best   
   that is constrained by some constraints, so to not be extremism or   
   radicalism of perfection, such as neo-nazism, that is problematic, you   
   have to read about those constraints in my below writing, so then you   
   are understanding that my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction"   
   is also constrained by the same constraints of morality of today such as   
   under democracy etc., so read all my following writing so that you   
   understand my political philosophy..   
      
      
   More political philosophy about life..   
      
      
   I think that there is many engines that push us forward,   
   but i don't think that we have to return to racial white nationalism,   
   because it can bring with it many problems such as hate between   
   different races, so i think that the best engine is to follow my Rule   
   of: "More perfection brings satisfaction..", this is i think the   
   smartest way to follow, so read about it in my following writing to   
   understand more:   
      
   More political philosophy about morality..   
      
      
   More about the efficient spirit..   
      
      
   When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and   
   eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being   
   this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan   
   couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes   
   with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to   
   prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient   
   philosophy. And it is also my spirit.   
      
   Read my previous thoughts to understand:   
      
   More political philosophy about the efficient spirit..   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)