From: d@d.d   
      
   Hello...   
      
      
   More about my spirit..   
      
      
   I think you know me more now, that i am a white arab, and that   
   i am a more serious software developer who has invented many scalable   
   algorithms and there implementations, and i am a gentleman type of   
   person, and i think that i am like a wise man type of person,   
   but today i will talk more about my spirit..   
      
   When you look at communism what do you think is the most important   
   architectural idea of communism ? the most important architectural idea   
   of communism is that communism wants to transcend the deficiencies   
   of humans such as the deficiencies of there natural instincts and such   
   towards a better quality, so communism has also understood that   
   we have to construct confidence that unites people, and from this   
   confidence we can notice that you have to transcend towards the power   
   of the architectural ideas that unites and make strong the people , this   
   is the most important part of communism, and what about my spirit ? i am   
   also, by logical analogy with communism, a person that has constructed a   
   political philosophy of ideas that has as a goal to bring confidence   
   and to unite people around them, this is my kind of spirit, but to   
   be able to be this realization you have to take care about your   
   level of sophistication and about your image, this is why you are seeing   
   me writing poetry in front of you and posting them here, and you are   
   noticing that i am posting about many of my software projects and my   
   scalable algorithms that i have invented, because this is also part of   
   the game of that i must take care my image that i project towards you so   
   that people be "confident" with me. So hope that you are more confident   
   with me, and here is my thoughts of my political philosophy:   
      
      
   More political philosophy about political correctness..   
      
   Now in political philosophy can we ask the question of:   
      
   Do we have to be political correctness or not ?   
      
   I think to be smart you have to define political correctness..   
      
   So then can we in political philosophy ask what is political correctness ?   
      
   I think that you have to know about morality to be able to answer this   
   question, and you will notice in my logical proof below that i think a   
   correct abstraction of what is morality is: "perfection at best", so why   
   i am choosing such abstraction  ? because we have to be perfection in   
   action by also being an effort of being more perfection, so then you are   
   noticing that morality must be pushed forward towards absolute   
   perfection, but perfection at best is also that we can for example say:   
   Perfection is perfection of not helping the weakest members of our   
   society and it is also perfection of helping the weakest members of the   
   society, and we can notice that each side has a weight of importance,   
   since we can not say that helping the weakest members of the society has   
   no importance, because it is also a perfection that has a weight of   
   importance, and logically we have not to neglect it, and as you have   
   noticed that i also said that: "Independently" of Democracy, we can say   
   that my Rule of: "More perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a   
   difficulty or with an effort of being more perfection that brings   
   satisfaction, so then now you are noticing that morality is also this   
   effort of helping others and it is also perfection in action towards   
   absolute perfection that is absolute happiness, so then you are noticing   
   that independently of democracy we can now notice that morality is also   
   this act of balancing between perfection of helping others and   
   perfection of moving forward towards absolute perfection that is   
   absolute happiness, and now you are noticing that when you look at today   
   world you are feeling that our today world is converging fast towards   
   this essence of morality of human beings, and now you are finally   
   noticing that you are able to see that this essence of morality   
   also dictates to us a kind of political correctness.  So read the rest   
   of my previous thoughts of my political philosophy to understand   
   more:   
      
      
      
   More about compassion in political philosophy..   
      
   And what about compassion in political philosophy ?   
      
   "Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More   
   perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an   
   effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction, and you have   
   noticed that i said the following so that to abstract it:   
      
   "When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and   
   eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being   
   this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan   
   couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes   
   with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to   
   prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient   
   philosophy. And it is also my spirit."   
      
   So then compassion is also "mechanical" that comes from my Rule of:   
   "More perfection brings satisfaction", since perfection is also   
   helping others, so then a more appropriate morality is to not neglect   
   helping others and to know how to help others.   
      
   So you are noticing that i am saying: "since perfection is also helping   
   others"   
      
   But i have to logically explain the big picture, here is how:   
      
   Since we can for example say: Perfection is perfection of not helping   
   the weakest members of our society and it is also perfection of helping   
   the weakest members of the society, and we can notice that each side has   
   a weight of importance, since we can not say that helping the weakest   
   members of the society has no importance, because it is also a   
   perfection that has a weight of importance, and logically we have not to   
   neglect it, and as you have noticed that i also said that:   
   "Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More   
   perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an   
   effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction.   
      
      
   More political philosophy of: What is morality ?   
      
   Am i crazy by saying that you have to follow my Rule of: "More   
   perfection brings satisfaction" ?   
      
   No, i am not crazy , since i am like a wise man type of person, so   
   i will explain more:   
      
   When i say that you have to follow the Rule of:   
      
   ""More perfection brings satisfaction"   
      
      
   You have to understand that i have abstracted the definition of morality   
   to: "Perfection at best" (read my proof below of it), and the "at best"   
   must be defined more, and you will notice in my below writing that   
   i have defined more what is the "at best" of "perfection at best" so   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)