Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.culture.quebec    |    More than just pale imitations of France    |    108,435 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 106,656 of 108,435    |
|    Wisdom90 to All    |
|    More philosophy about political philosop    |
|    26 Dec 19 21:02:00    |
      From: d@d.d              Hello...                     More philosophy about political philosophy..                     In political philosophy there is a difference between a hacker of       political philosophy and a serious engineer of political philosophy,       there is a big difference between the two, i give you an example:              There is some white supremacists on internet that want to hack political       philosophy by just saying that they are violent with arabs and with       blacks and with asians and they showing there destructive way of doing,       but this is just hacking in political philosophy that is not able to be       serious engineering in political philosophy, because in serious       engineering of political philosophy you have       to know how to built it from the top to down like in software       engineering, so you have to be capable of showing the efficient way of       doing in political philosophy that is able to convince, this a very       important requirement in a serious political philosophy.              Read the rest of my thoughts:              About 2+2=4..              I have to be frank with you, because i need to make you understand more       my personality, so here is my kind of personality:                     So when i see the following equality:              2+2=4              It makes me feel "good" and "energized", because it is like technical       and i have a technical mind and it is genetical in me, so when i see the       above equality, it remembers me that it is like playing a game of chess       with perfection, so i am playing it and in this game i need to be more       and more "perfection" to be more satisfied of me, and i know it because       i have experienced it, so i am constantly in need to be more and more       perfection, so it is my engine and it is also genetical in me, and my       technical and rational mind is also genetical in me, so i am playing       this way at the game of morality.              Read the rest of my thoughts to understand more:              More political philosophy about the purpose of human life..              I have to be smart to make you feel the purpose of life, so       we have to be smart and precise, so as you will notice below in       my logical proof of what is morality, you will notice that morality       is the fact that we are going forward at best towards more       and more perfection towards absolute perfection and absolute       happiness, and part of morality is the fact that       we have to know how to "tune" morality so that to be the right       perfection, and this is the abstraction of morality that makes morality       "universal", and the purpose of life is extracted from this universal       morality, and it comes from my Rule of: "More perfection brings       satisfaction", and you can clearly notice it by my following writing:              As you have noticed i have just said (read below) the following:              "First you have to know how to take care of your "image" , and       taking care of your image is also an engine that pushes you       forward towards more perfection, but there is also my Rule of:       "More perfection brings satisfaction" that is also an engine       that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection,       since also i said that this satisfaction is double satisfaction       as i explained it to you by saying:              "When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and       eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being       this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan       couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes       with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to       prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient       philosophy. And it is also my spirit.""              But you have to be "smart" to understand my example above, the double       satisfaction is also the intellectual or cultural satisfaction       and the material satisfaction, because knowing how to cook       a Moroccan couscous is intellectual or cultural and eating a       Moroccan couscous is material.              And more political philosophy about money to understand more:              When you look at the beautiful, like a beautiful moon in the night,       you will notice that it is like a satisfaction of looking at the       beautiful, but at the same time the moon is also a wild place and       dangerous place, so by logical analogy, if you only work for money , it       it is like thinking at the other side of the moon that is dangerous for       us and that is a wild place and logically inferring that the world is       not beautiful and that this or that thing can look beautiful but our       world is not beautiful and that this spirit makes you like hating our       world, but saying so and being so is like working only for money and it       is a "corruption" of the mind, so you have to change your "perception"       and "conception" and to think differently by adhering to my Rule of:       "More perfection brings satisfaction", it means that more perfection       brings a satisfaction of being more perfection, and this Rule is an       engine that pushes you forward towards more and more perfection, and       this is also an efficient spirit and it is also my spirit.              And Read carefully all the rest of my thoughts of my political       philosophy and you will understand more:              Here is the requirements of my new religion..              Is my new religion in logical contradiction with the requirement of       being a highly efficient system ? i don't think so, because in my new       religion you have to believe in God and the rest of the morality is my       following thoughts of my political philosophy that "show" the way:              More political philosophy about: Is a monotheistic religion a corruption       of morality ?              I mean how to enforce correctly efficiency inside the system of a       monotheistic religion ?                     So you are noticing that my new religion is different, because we must       have a right level of independency from morality of a monotheistic       religion because i think that the monotheistic religions are not apt       at being the right "efficiency" and you are clearly and logically       noticing it, but what do i mean by efficiency ?              First we have to define and understand what is efficiency, so here is my       answer and my own thoughts about it:              ---              I was just reading the following webpage on "researchgate" about:              How can I define efficiency and what are the different types of efficiency ?              Here it is:              https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_can_I_define_efficiency_an       _what_are_the_different_types_of_efficiency                     And if we look at the dictionary, it says:              "Efficiency: it is the ability to do things well, successfully, and       without waste."              But now you are feeling that doing the things well and successfully       looks like performance, so we can say in computer science that a              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca