Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.culture.quebec    |    More than just pale imitations of France    |    108,436 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 106,760 of 108,436    |
|    Wisdom90 to All    |
|    More philosophy of what is it to be a ge    |
|    20 Feb 20 17:41:47    |
      From: d@d.d              Hello...                     More philosophy of what is it to be a genius ?              You have just noticed that i said in one of my previous posts that i am       "like" a genius, but you have to understand the "like", that doesn't       mean that i am a genius, but perhaps that i am a genius ! but i will try       to make you understand "more" what is it to be a genius: i think that       you have to understand the following rule that says: You have to know       how to minimize at best complexity by maximizing at best efficiency !       and this is the rule that i am following, and i think this rule is the       most important goal that a genius wants to attain ! and when you       understand it , you will become much more smart ! a genius wants first       to do from simple things or simple few things great things ! so you have       to understand it, so it brings us to the question of how to make from       simple things, or simple few things, great things ? and this rule looks       like minimizing at best complexity by maximizing at best efficiency ! so       to understand better what looks like in practice this rule, read my       following thoughts:              About smartness and how to measure it..              I think that in IQ tests smartness is measured by a level of difficulty,       so you have to solve a certain level of difficulty. So it is relative to       a certain level of difficulty of the IQ tests such as those of Mensa or       such. But i think if we are smart and we lower the level of difficulty       by for example easying the understanding of knowledge and science and       technics, so i think that we are going to become more smart and more       capable at smartness. This is why i also say the following:              Now today i will do political philosophy about Pedagogy..              Can we ask the question of: What must be an efficient Pedagogy today?,       i think that we have to notice that the exponential progress       and the law of accelerating returns are influencing Pedagogy,       because today we have to be more efficient at learning,       because i think that the level of sophistication of today       is much more than the past and i think that this has       as a cause that we have to be much more sophisticated than       the past to be able to be efficient learning, i think that this is       the "first" requirement of today Pedagogy, and more than that       we have to define the other main parts of what is it to be efficient       learning, i mean what are the main parts of "efficient learning" that       have a great importance ? take for example choosing the right tools for       learning , so the first question of how to choose the right tools for       learning is to know how to choose the right tools, not only that but to       be able for the tool to be the right tool, the learning of the right       tool must be made more "easier", now you are noticing       that the parts of efficient learning are becoming more clear,       this is why i said before in my political philosophy       the following that permits you to understand more what i am saying:              What is happening in my brain ?              I will speak more about me so that you understand my way of doing since       it is also like my philosophy, to be more smart you have to be capable       of reducing efficiently "complexity" so that to be efficient and so that       to be more successful, but how can you do it ? you have to be able       to know about the steps that guides you into the right direction,       first i will speak about my way so that you understand me better,       first step you have to be able to "prioritize" efficiently, because       to be able to be successful you have to prioritize, so look for example       at me, i have decided to "study" more and to study more "efficiently" so       that to be more successful, but this is not "sufficient" to know,       because to be able to be efficient at reducing complexity you have to be       able to be efficiently selective of your knowledge, and this efficiently        "selective" has to adhere in its turn to the process of being       efficient at reducing "complexity", so you have to be able to select       "efficiently" "efficient" knowledge that is more "easy" to learn so that       to reduce complexity, thus you have to be able to ask "questions" to       this or that right persons to be able to be efficient at selecting your       "knowledge", next step you have to be "tenacity" at studying efficiently       and you have to study more and more and you have to ask questions to       your professors and next step after you have been able to learn more and       more you have to be able at being efficient at "reusability" of your       efficient knowledge and this is a very important step , so don't neglect       efficient "reusability" of your knowledge, this is also the steps that i       have followed and i have also used my "smartness" to be more efficient.              Also i said the following about smartness:              I think there is a diversity in the set that we call people, but       we have to understand that to be able to classify them by smartness,       we have to understand that there is not only "IQ" as we know it       that can measure smartness, because i say that there is a missing       important part, this is why i say the way of measuring by IQ is still       fuzzy, because i say that statistically we can see that a missing       important part is that a human can be genetically like more articulated       in his thinking and that is like more constancy of more calculations       and/or more constancy of more logic and more constancy of more       rationality, it is like being like a computer that calculates more and       that is logical more and that is rationality more, and this how i am in       real life, and this is also the missing part of smartness that is not       measured by IQ because it is more dynamic.              And here is also what i said previously:              I am like a genius, because i have invented many scalable algorithms and       i am inventing many scalable algorithms, you have to see me to believe,       this is why i am talking here, i have showed you some of my scalable       algorithms that i have invented, but this is not all, because i have       invented many other scalable algorithms that i have not showed you here,       and here is one more new invention that i have just       invented right now:              If you have noticed i have just implemented my EasyList here:              https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/easylist-for-delphi-and-freepascal              But i have just enhanced its algorithm to be scalable in the Add()       method and in the search methods, but it is not all , i will use for       that my just new invention that is my generally scalable counting       networks, also its parallel sort algorithm will become much much more       scalable , because i will use for that my other invention of my fully my              [continued in next message]              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca