From: d@d.d   
      
   Hello,   
      
      
   Do you have to hate the following derivative formulation ?   
      
   DerivativeOf(2x) = 2   
      
   First you have to be like mathematical and see that the above derivative   
   formulation makes us know that it is higher level abstraction and that   
   higher level abstraction is also powerful, so this is a rule that is   
   important and powerful, and the above derivative formulation makes us   
   know that it is a simple and a simple derivative formulation, so if you   
   want to hate it that's logically inconsistency, because this derivative   
   formulation is both powerful and weak as i am explaining it,  and this   
   is one of the most important part to know that makes you powerful too,   
   and this part is about higher level abstraction. So you have to be   
   careful before hating this simple derivative formulation or before   
   hating the others.   
      
   Read my following thoughts of my political philosophy to understand more:   
      
   Is political philosophy powerful ?   
      
   I think that here there is a distinction to be made, is that   
   we notice that there is political philosophy of the thinker and   
   political philosophy of the user, in political philosophy of the user is   
   that you have to know like the tendency or the like , it is like   
   macroeconomics, and this is what makes it powerful, so you have not just   
   to see the power of the thinker, but the power of the user is also very   
   important, and you can notice it by looking at the following derivative   
   formulation: DerivativeOf(2x) = 2, so we can use this formulation of   
   derivative without understanding from where it comes, and this looks   
   like higher level abstraction of macroeconomics, and i say that this   
   higher level abstractions are also powerful in real world , and this way   
   is also powerful, and by analogy it looks like the political philosophy   
   of the user , so this is why i am here with you doing political   
   philosophy, because i am knowing in advance that political philosophy of   
   the user is also so powerful ! so then can we ask if the darkness can   
   live without the lightness ? or the lightness without the darkness ? so   
   as you are noticing that diversity is still necessary, so then the   
   political philosophy of the user is still necessary and it is really   
   important, so is this necessary diversity of darkness and lightness   
   decent morality ? so as you are noticing you have to be much more   
   sophisticated to be able to define what is decent morality, so do you   
   say that it is not decent morality by the fact that necessary evil of   
   darkness still exist in today civilized morality ? i think that this way   
   is the way of inferiority. This is why you have to read my following   
   thoughts of political philosophy to understand more:   
      
      
   More political philosophy of what is smartness..   
      
   I am noticing that my kind of smartness plays an important role in a   
   more globalized smartness, this awareness of it that comes from   
   experience shows that Mensa IQ tests are not testing correctly   
   smartness, because there is an important variable that is missing in   
   IQ tests and you can notice it by the fact that you can be aware by   
   experience that there is some people that naturally have a high degree   
   of efficiency in that they are constantly more rigorous in there   
   thinking, this is what is missing the Mensa tests, and you are noticing   
   it in my thoughts of my political philosophy that i am like constantly   
   more rigorous in my thinking than others, and this kind of smartness   
   is important for a more globalized smartness, because this smartness   
   is important for organizing more efficiently the more bigger, and   
   this kind of smartness is not tested by Mensa tests or the like that   
   measures IQ.   
      
   More political philosophy of how can we be more love ..   
      
   I am like a wise man and i think that like in monotheistic religions,   
   monotheistic religions have brought a new conception of what is human   
   being in that they say that humans have a soul from God that is like   
   perfected by God and that is beauty from God, so this conception brings   
   much more respect for humans, but in political philosophy this is   
   different, how can we emulate this effect? i think by logical analogy   
   political philosophy is also morality that says that you have to perfect   
   morality so that morality be beauty by bringing confidence and   
   acceptance of it and that pushes us like an engine forward towards more   
   and more perfection, but here again you will notice that this more and   
   more perfection is constituted of weighted perfections by there level of   
   importance, but here again you are noticing the "contrast" between a   
   subjective view of what is morality and an objective view of what is   
   morality, because the objective view of morality will view the global   
   system as a system that has not to neglect variables such helping   
   others, so perfection has to be for example a balance between   
   performance and helping others so that to be a more civilized morality,   
   and this makes us more aware of morality that it is also balance that   
   makes us more respectful and more love as soon as we are aware of what   
   is morality, so you are noticing that the essence of morality can be   
   viewed independently of democracy as being this decency that makes us   
   more confident and more positive, read gain my following thoughts of my   
   political philosophy so that you understand more about what is morality:   
      
   More political philosophy about can we be successful without believing   
   in God ?   
      
   This is a very important question in political philosophy..   
      
   I think when you are made like a wise man you will notice that morality   
   is a sophisticated thing, morality is not only the set of both the sets   
   of good and bad, but morality is a dynamic process and a sophisticated   
   process that needs from us agility and flexibility and sophistication,   
   so now you are noticing that morality is symbolically like a God that we   
   have to follow, but now you are noticing that morality of for example   
   neo-nazism is a subjective view of what is morality that is not   
   objectivity, because neo-nazism by its too much violence towards others   
   is lack of flexibility that permits to go from a too localized   
   optimization to an efficient globalized optimization that is much   
   better for humanity, this neo-nazism or white supremacism is a too   
   pessimistic view of our world that has as an effect to be an inferior   
   act of human nature that has the tendency to being too much dictatorship   
   or too much fascism that is too much violence, this is why we can   
   not be confident with neo-nazism or white supremacism, because a more   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)