From: d@d.d   
      
   Hello...   
      
      
   Read again, i correct one last typo..   
      
   More about political philosophy of the thinker..   
      
   I think that political philosophy of the thinker is a sophisticated   
   process of thinking , but can we abstract it much more efficiently ?   
   i think that by logical analogy like in the learning process there is   
   the learning process by mistakes and the learning process by prevention   
   and learning process by using smartness , here again you are noticing   
   that the learning process by prevention also reuses previous knowledge   
   in a form of higher level abstraction,  and the learning process by   
   using genetical smartness is like a the low level abstraction that works   
   on higher level abstractions, and the process of learning by mistakes is   
   also necessary, but here again we have to notice the level of smartness   
   by looking and this dynamic process, but here again you will notice that   
   political philosophy of the thinker uses this same dynamic process, but   
   the beauty of this dynamic process is the act of looking and measuring   
   the smartness by analyzing how a human being uses smartly this dynamic   
   process, this is why i am in front of you inventing my thoughts of my   
   political philosophy, but notice carefully that in high standards the   
   learning process by prevention must be a maximization of the avoidance   
   of mistakes in the thinking process, but how to define or how to measure   
   a "mistake" in the thinking process? i think that it depends on the   
   standards , so when it is a high standard, a mistake has to be measured   
   by the best perfection as a reference of measure, so i think that   
   political philosophy of the thinker follows this same dynamic process.   
      
   Do you have to hate the following derivative formulation ?   
      
   DerivativeOf(2x) = 2   
      
   First you have to be like mathematical and see that the above derivative   
   formulation makes us know that it is higher level abstraction and that   
   higher level abstraction is also powerful, so this is a rule that is   
   important and powerful, and the above derivative formulation makes us   
   know that it is a simple and a simple derivative formulation, so if you   
   want to hate it that's logically inconsistency, because this derivative   
   formulation is both powerful and weak as i am explaining it,  and this   
   is one of the most important part to know that makes you powerful too,   
   and this part is about higher level abstraction. So you have to be   
   careful before hating this simple derivative formulation or before   
   hating the others.   
      
   Read my following thoughts of my political philosophy to understand more:   
      
   Is political philosophy powerful ?   
      
   I think that here there is a distinction to be made, is that   
   we notice that there is political philosophy of the thinker and   
   political philosophy of the user, in political philosophy of the user is   
   that you have to know like the tendency or the like , it is like   
   macroeconomics, and this is what makes it powerful, so you have not just   
   to see the power of the thinker, but the power of the user is also very   
   important, and you can notice it by looking at the following derivative   
   formulation: DerivativeOf(2x) = 2, so we can use this formulation of   
   derivative without understanding from where it comes, and this looks   
   like higher level abstraction of macroeconomics, and i say that this   
   higher level abstractions are also powerful in real world , and this way   
   is also powerful, and by analogy it looks like the political philosophy   
   of the user , so this is why i am here with you doing political   
   philosophy, because i am knowing in advance that political philosophy of   
   the user is also so powerful ! so then can we ask if the darkness can   
   live without the lightness ? or the lightness without the darkness ? so   
   as you are noticing that diversity is still necessary, so then the   
   political philosophy of the user is still necessary and it is really   
   important, so is this necessary diversity of darkness and lightness   
   decent morality ? so as you are noticing you have to be much more   
   sophisticated to be able to define what is decent morality, so do you   
   say that it is not decent morality by the fact that necessary evil of   
   darkness still exist in today civilized morality ? i think that this way   
   is the way of inferiority. This is why you have to read my following   
   thoughts of political philosophy to understand more:   
      
      
   More political philosophy of what is smartness..   
      
   I am noticing that my kind of smartness plays an important role in a   
   more globalized smartness, this awareness of it that comes from   
   experience shows that Mensa IQ tests are not testing correctly   
   smartness, because there is an important variable that is missing in   
   IQ tests and you can notice it by the fact that you can be aware by   
   experience that there is some people that naturally have a high degree   
   of efficiency in that they are constantly more rigorous in there   
   thinking, this is what is missing the Mensa tests, and you are noticing   
   it in my thoughts of my political philosophy that i am like constantly   
   more rigorous in my thinking than others, and this kind of smartness   
   is important for a more globalized smartness, because this smartness   
   is important for organizing more efficiently the more bigger, and   
   this kind of smartness is not tested by Mensa tests or the like that   
   measures IQ.   
      
   More political philosophy of how can we be more love ..   
      
   I am like a wise man and i think that like in monotheistic religions,   
   monotheistic religions have brought a new conception of what is human   
   being in that they say that humans have a soul from God that is like   
   perfected by God and that is beauty from God, so this conception brings   
   much more respect for humans, but in political philosophy this is   
   different, how can we emulate this effect? i think by logical analogy   
   political philosophy is also morality that says that you have to perfect   
   morality so that morality be beauty by bringing confidence and   
   acceptance of it and that pushes us like an engine forward towards more   
   and more perfection, but here again you will notice that this more and   
   more perfection is constituted of weighted perfections by there level of   
   importance, but here again you are noticing the "contrast" between a   
   subjective view of what is morality and an objective view of what is   
   morality, because the objective view of morality will view the global   
   system as a system that has not to neglect variables such helping   
   others, so perfection has to be for example a balance between   
   performance and helping others so that to be a more civilized morality,   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)