From: d@d.d   
      
   Hello...   
      
   Read again, i correct a last typo..   
      
   More political philosophy of what is it to gay or what is it   
   to be an homosexual or bisexual and more..   
      
   How do you think i know about gays and homosexuals and bisexuals ?   
      
   You have to understand that i am a special guy, because i know that i am   
   also special, like gays and homosexuals and bisexuals are also special,   
   there is others that are the other special, but i think that the main   
   problem is that it is: "Un mauvais bruit dans la musique qui qui nous   
   derange!", you have to understand what it means in french, it is that   
   the problem in real life is that there like a music that is not so   
   good for the ears and there is music that is good for the ears, and   
   this is the main problem of being special like a gay or homosexual and   
   bisexual, so i say that the envirenment is really important ! so what do   
   you think i am doing ? and am i smart ? so this is why i know   
   about this problem, so there is the way of reducing the sound   
   of this music that is no so good for the ears by knowing how to be   
   "Zen", cela veut dire savoir comment être Zen !, et cela est important,   
   and this is really important, but i think that there is a way that is   
   more effective, it is the way of being both "rigorous" and being "Zen",   
   this  is what i am doing by posting my poems of Love and by posting my   
   thoughts of my political philosophy, so if you understand me you will   
   notice that i am smart by doing it, because i know what is it to be gay   
   or homosexual or bisexual ! do you think i am stupid ? no, i am not   
   stupid ! this why i am reducing the sound of the music that is is not so   
   good for the ears by being this rigorous to be able to convince the   
   others ! but i am not only Zen and more rigorous, but i am also Love by   
   posting my poems of Love and such so that to transcend more !   
      
   More political philosophy about arts and poetry and more..   
      
   I am much more technicality, and i am multidisciplinary because i have a   
   Diploma in Microelectronics and informatics and i have studied more   
   mathematics and i have studied operational research and i am also an   
   inventor of many scalable algorithms and there implementations, and when   
   you have studied operational research like me, you will find management   
   or operation management easy to learn, but you have to be more smart and   
   notice that we have to avoid the trap of looking at and understanding   
   life from a small and simple window that makes our view a simplistic   
   view and that can cause harm, this is one of the main problem, it is by   
   logical analogy in political philosophy like of being subjectivity that   
   lacks objectivity, this is the disadvantage of arts and poetry,   
   arts and poetry lacks rigor of technicality and/or science and this also   
   causes that arts and poetry is also abstraction that lacks objectivity   
   by the fact that arts and poetry lacks rigor of technicality and/or   
   science, so we have to be aware that the good way of doing is knowing   
   how to abstract life so that to be able to understand it much more   
   efficiently , and so that to be efficient, and this also demands from us   
   to be rigor such as of technicality and/or science, so as you are   
   noticing that the good way of doing is also to learn the way of "rigor"   
   and to learn more technicality and/or science so that to be more   
   efficient. And as you will notice i am logically consistent in my below   
   writing by speaking about rigor.   
      
   More political philosophy about poetry and more..   
      
   I think there is many kinds of poetry, but you have to understand my   
   kind of poetry, it is like technicality, i mean it is like the state of   
   being technical and to use of technical terms or methods, because you   
   will notice that what i want to do is abstracting, in a form of poems,   
   what is morality or what is Love by being more rigorous than average   
   human being, and the word "rigorous" is King here, because being this   
   more rigorous must be the way of doing also in poetry, but is it an   
   Elitist way of doing ? now we have to be clear, i am of the ones that   
   thinks that to not being too much individualism in our society, we have   
   to know how to be more beautiful, but beautiful here means something, i   
   think to not be extremism we have to know that being more beautiful from   
   the inside is important, and this more beautiful from the inside is also   
   being more educated and being more aware and being more rigorous and   
   more technicality, and by being so you make humans more attractive and   
   more organized, and this is the key here, but you will notice that i   
   have also proved in my political philosophy below that beauty is   
   universal, but this is not sufficient to know, we have to be selective   
   by prioritizing by weights of importance, and since the intellectual   
   part of a human is so important, so i think that this beauty of the   
   inside is also important, but we have to standardize this beauty by   
   using smartness, so now you are noticing that it is a really important   
   matter, since to be able to be organized we have to be responsability   
   and this responsability is also that people have to adapt efficiently   
   and be guided by Elites, but do we have to be pessimism about efficient   
   adaptation ? i don't think so because i am able to notice that there is   
   also the way of making it simple and powerful, but what is it to make it   
   simple and powerful ?  i think that it is also the way of simple and   
   powerful high level abstractions, you can notice it by the fact that   
   there is also simple and higher level abstraction of understanding a   
   mathematical theorem and this permits to be efficient, and this rule of   
   learning by simple and powerful high level abstractions is really   
   efficient, and as a logical proof, look at my following tutorial of how   
   i am solving a Jackson network problem with simple and powerful high   
   level abstraction way of doing, download it here in my website and read   
   it carefully:   
      
   https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/jackson-network-problem   
      
   So this is why we have not to be pessimistic about the learning process   
   of people of the society, because i think that this way of doing by   
   learning with simple and powerful high level abstractions is also really   
   powerful.   
      
   More about political philosophy of the thinker..   
      
   I think that political philosophy of the thinker is a sophisticated   
   process of thinking , but can we abstract it much more efficiently ?   
   i think that by logical analogy like in the learning process there is   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)