From: d@d.d   
      
   Hello...   
      
      
   More about individual morality and morality..   
      
   I think i have to define more individual morality since i am   
   using it in my thoughts below:   
      
   What is individual morality?   
      
   It is the interpretation by the individual of what constitutes right and   
   wrong.   
      
   Now, if one wants to exist within a society, a societal contract may   
   need to be placed upon the individual.   
      
   Generally this means don’t break laws and try not to screw people over.   
      
      
   The very important question is to ask the question of:   
      
   Is today morality decency ?   
      
   I think we have also to know how to guide our humanity towards a much   
   better future, so you are noticing that this requires also knowing how   
   to be the necessary "tolerance" and the necessary "patience", because   
   you have to think twice before causing too much harm to our humanity by   
   being destructive wars.   
      
   Read my previous thoughts to understand:   
      
      
   More political philosophy about morality..   
      
   Hope that you will read below my thoughts to understand better,   
   so you will understand from my thoughts that there is something   
   happening, it is that morality can not exist if it is extremism that   
   neglect helping others or neglect helping the weakest members   
   of the society or the humanity, because the good and bad is not only   
   determined by the context of reality, but by the fact that perfections   
   of helping the others or helping the weakest members of the society have   
   weights of importance independently of democracy or the context of the   
   reality external to humans, and we have not to neglect those weights of   
   importance or morality will cease to exist if it is only extremism,   
   since morality has to be "reason" that survive, so if it is extremism ,   
   so it will become craziness for reason, and this craziness of morality   
   is determined by the level of decency of morality, and if it is   
   extremism it is not reasonable, so it is not reason.   
      
   More political philosophy about flexibility and relativism..   
      
   I said the following:   
      
   "I think that relativism is an interesting subject in political   
   philosophy, because the act of  being relativism also dictates   
   to seek for the truth, and does the truth exist or even the truth is   
   relative ? i think the extremist view of relativism that says that there   
   are no absolute truths is not correct thinking, because i think that we   
   can prove that there is absolute truth of this or that, but what is also   
   related to relativism is that it encourages us to think correctly in a   
   holistic manner or in a globalized manner or in an objective manner to   
   avoid incorrect thinking. And this is related to my following thoughts   
   about exponential progress where i am also showing how to think it   
   objectively."   
      
   I am a white arab , and i think i am more smart, and frankly i   
   do consider the act of doing political philosophy as a noble act of   
   thinking, political philosophy is so important and you have to   
   give it a rightful consideration. So now i will go much   
   further in political philosophy about relativism, because   
   i think that relativism brings the  necessary "flexibility"   
   for our survival as a humanity, because relativism also encourages   
   us to find the truth by proving it, and since it encourages us to find   
   the truth , so it encourages us to be a globalized thinking that brings   
   the necessary objectivity and flexibility, so now you are noticing that   
   it is related to the essence of morality and the essence of humans, this   
   is what makes it so important, so now you are noticing that we have   
   first to know more about the essence of morality of humans and the   
   essence of humans that bring the necessary flexibility as a requirement   
   for our own survival as a humanity, so as you will notice that it   
   is inherent to morality that it has the tendency to avoid extremism,   
   but how can i say such thing? because we have to contextualize   
   human morality and to contextualize human morality is to know also that   
   morality is not individual morality, so the context is also a social   
   contract that also dictates that morality exists only if the context   
   permits it to exist, so then you are noticing that the context that   
   permits morality to exist also permits morality to have the tendency to   
   avoid extremism, so then you are noticing that we have to be careful by   
   being sophistication that permits us to be a decent civilization, so   
   then morality comes with the right flexibility that permits it to avoid   
   extremism, and this flexibility is like a decentralization of power from   
   perfection of pure performance towards perfection that helps the others   
   or help the weakest members of the society or humanity, and here is my   
   following thoughts that talks about what is morality:   
      
      
   And what do i mean by morality is perfection at best ?   
      
   I said before the following:   
      
   "Because morality exists because we have to avoid the bad   
   And we have to avoid the bad by also trying to maximize at best the good   
   And trying to maximize at best the good is also called: perfection at best   
   So morality is pushed towards absolute perfection   
   So that to be able to solve all our problems   
   And be absolute happiness that is the goal   
   But morality of today must at least be a decent morality   
   To avoid desorder and violence inside the system"   
      
      
   So as you are noticing that even if morality is a system of values and   
   principles of conduct, we can ask what is the characteristics of this   
   system of values and principles of conduct? and we can notice that the   
   most important thing is not the writing of this system of values and   
   principles of conduct, but it is the characteristic of the writing of   
   this system of values and principles of conduct that is to perfect at   
   best, and since morality in the dictionary is also a Virtuous conduct,   
   so i think my definition of morality that it is perfection at best is   
   logical.   
      
   Here is the definition of morality in the dictionary, look at it and you   
   will notice that it also means Virtuous conduct:   
      
   https://www.thefreedictionary.com/morality   
      
      
   And read more here in the Business dictionary:   
      
   http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/morality.html   
      
   It says also that morality is:   
      
   "Conformance to a recognized code, doctrine, or system of rules of what   
   is right or wrong and to behave accordingly."   
      
   So as you are noticing that morality is also to "behave" accordingly to   
   the system of rules, so i think my definition of morality that it is   
   perfection at best is logical.   
      
      
   More about compassion in political philosophy..   
      
   And what about compassion in political philosophy ?   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)