From: aminer68@gmail.com   
      
   Hello..   
      
      
   More about empathy and compassion and solidarity..   
      
   I say that empathy can lead us into compassion, and compassion can lead us   
   into solidarity. But the important question to ask: does this solidarity needs   
   from us to become materialistic so that to help efficiently? since also as you   
   have just noticed    
   that i just said the following in my previous post:   
      
   You have to understand more my philosophy, i am empathy with innocent humans   
   that are suffering or dying, but this empathy is like nothing, since i have to   
   become rich or very rich to be able to efficiently help people(with such being   
   charity)."    
      
   So i think it needs more political philosophy, so i will start    
   to do more political philosophy about it by saying the following:   
      
   I am not a Marxist, but one useful part of Karl Marx thinking says    
   that we have not to transcend the alienation or oppression of humans    
   just by using the "idea"(or by only empathy or compassion), but we have to   
   transcend it in reality and this needs materialism (that matters above all for   
   Karl Marx), since Karl Marx has said that he was not idealism like the   
   philosopher Hegel. If    
   according to the philosopher Hegel it is the idea that takes precedence over   
   everything and that everything derives from the idea, the concept and the   
   universal spirit, for Karl Marx it is material reality that matters above all.   
      
   So read my previous thoughts of my previous post to understand:   
      
   More about logical abstraction..   
      
   I said in my previous post the following:   
      
   "Suffering and death are nothing for me."   
      
   So is it not a contradiction with my new post?   
      
   No, it is a kind of logical abstraction, since i am saying   
   below the following:   
      
   "You have to understand more my philosophy, i am empathy with innocent humans   
   that are suffering or dying, but this empathy is like nothing, since i have to   
   become rich or very rich to be able to efficiently help people(with such being   
   charity)."   
      
   So i can logically abstract and say i am still not rich or very rich,   
   so i am looking at suffering or dying of innocent humans and i am not   
   able to help efficiently, so i am like just empathy towards it, but from   
   my above writing: empathy is like nothing, so that means: Suffering   
   and death is empathy for me that is like nothing for me,  so it is by logical   
   abstraction like saying: "Suffering and death are nothing for me.", so you   
   have to understand the logical abstraction.   
      
      
   What about my empathy..   
      
      
   You have to understand more my philosophy, i am empathy with innocent humans   
   that are suffering or dying, but this empathy is like nothing, since i have to   
   become rich or very rich to be able to efficiently help people(with such being   
   charity), and here    
   is how i am doing it:   
      
   I will explain my philosophy: I am finding love by playing smartly at the game   
   of life, life for me is like playing smartly at the game of chess, so i have   
   to be smart at this game, and i love it very much, and i think it is really   
   beautiful and i am    
   loving it. So life is a game that is so exciting in the positive way because   
   it appeals to our smartness.   
      
   What about the powerful tool to become smart ?   
      
   I think i am smart, and you have to understand more   
   my way of doing, take for example what we call knowledge,   
   i am smart at being efficiently "selective" of knowledge, not   
   only that but i am smart at maximizing efficiency of   
   my learning knowledge by minimizing difficulty of my learning knowledge, and i   
   am smart at being efficient knowledge with being   
   much less knowledge. So this is why you have to know more my way   
   of doing that is smart, read more in the following about my way of doing:   
      
      
   What about the protocols?   
      
   You have to know more about my personality, doing your PhD   
   is like a "protocol" that you have to follow, but there is   
   some special personalities like me that are smart that   
   don't need to follow this protocol, so even if i am not a PhD researcher, i am   
   doing Research and development (R&D) like i am doing and i am inventing like i   
   am inventing (read below to notice it), so i don't want to follow some   
   protocols to become very    
   rich, but i am respecting the laws and i think by my way of doing i will   
   become successful and rich.   
      
   I am a white arab that is like the Bill Gates of Microsoft, i mean that i am   
   thinking big and wanting to do business big and wanting to become very rich,   
   and i am  doing Research and development (R&D) like i am doing(read below to   
   know how i am doing it),   
    so this is why i just written the following about my personality:   
      
   I will explain my philosophy: I am finding love by playing smartly at the game   
   of life, life for me is like playing smartly at the game of chess, so i have   
   to be smart at this game, and i love it very much, and i think it is really   
   beautiful and i am    
   loving it. So life is a game that is so exciting in the positive way because   
   it appeals to our smartness.   
      
   More about what is being smartness..   
      
   You have to be confident with me, i am a white arab and i am a gentleman type   
   of person and i think i am a wise type of person..   
      
   Now you have to understand that i have just invented today two other   
   "powerful" scalable algorithms, so as you notice that i am not just talking ,   
   since i am inventing many scalable algorithms "quickly", and i have invented   
   many scalable algorithms and holy grail algorithms that are hard or very hard   
   to invent, so i think    
   i will be really successful and i will become very rich.   
      
   Yet more precision about my way of doing..   
      
   Programming is very easy for me, I am not like a programmer, because i am like   
   Research and development (R&D), i am adding value by inventing many scalable   
   algorithms and holy grail algorithms that are hard or very hard to invent, so   
   the added value is    
   that i will also integrate some of my inventions with some of my softwares so   
   that i grow exponentially my customers, so that i become very rich, and i will   
   also sell   
   some of my algorithms, i think my way of doing will be successful.   
      
   More about my way of doing..   
      
   I think i am smart like a genius, and i have like a bachelor degree   
   in microelectronics and informatics and mathematics, but i am not like a   
   bachelor, i am like a PhD , since i have invented many scalable algorithms and   
   holy grail algorithms that are hard or very hard to invent, and i will sell   
   some of them of course(and    
   i will integrate some of them with other of my softwares,  and i will sell   
   those softwares,   
   and i think it will also be successful).   
      
   Read my following previous thoughts:   
      
   More about the Holy Grail algorithms..   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)