Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.culture.quebec    |    More than just pale imitations of France    |    108,436 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 107,546 of 108,436    |
|    ram to All    |
|    Read again, i correct about what about x    |
|    21 Nov 20 09:52:22    |
      From: aminer68@gmail.com              Hello..                            Read again, i correct about what about x86 vs ARM processors ?              x86 instruction set is CISC and x86 architecture is RISC(inside)       and ARM instruction set is RISC and ARM architecture is RISC.              The CISC approach attempts to minimize the number of instructions per program,       sacrificing the number of cycles per instruction. RISC does the opposite,       reducing the cycles per instruction at the cost of the number of instructions       per program.              The RISC ISA emphasizes software over hardware. The RISC instruction set       requires one to write more efficient software (e.g., compilers or code) with       fewer instructions. CISC ISAs use more transistors in the hardware       to implement more instructions and more complex instructions as well.              CISC simplify the software by needing hardware structure to be more complex.              Programming CISC-based computers is easier than in other designs because there       is a single instruction for both simple and complex tasks.              Programming in RISC is more difficult and time-consuming than in the other       design, because most of the complex instructions are simulated using simple       instructions.                     So i think that CISC instruction set is less error prone to program than       RISC instruction set, so i think that x86 instruction set is better       for safety.                     Thank you,       Amine Moulay Ramdane.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca