Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.culture.quebec    |    More than just pale imitations of France    |    108,435 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 107,620 of 108,435    |
|    ram to All    |
|    About the Microsoft windows futex..    |
|    15 Jan 21 12:54:19    |
      From: aminer68@gmail.com              Hello,                     About the Microsoft windows futex..                     Bonita Montero has just posted a simple benchmark that shows the difference in       speed between a windows futex and a spinlock, and here is my conclusion:              I think i can logically infer the following from the benchmark,              Since the benchmark is giving 6x times more speed to the spinlock than       to the windows futex, so i think that the windows futex is still doing a       system call directly without spinning so that to reduce the system calls that       are expensive and so that to avoid convoying, this is why i think the windows       futex is still slow and        it is not good.              And since the windows futex is not reducing the system calls, here is       another problem with the system calls of the windows futex:              System calls have become more expensive with Meltdown              Read more here:              https://hackernoon.com/system-calls-have-been-more-expensive-wit       -meltdown-how-to-avoid-them-af4b0026d35a              Note: Futexes have been implemented in Microsoft Windows since Windows 8 or       Windows Server 2012 under the name WaitOnAddress.                     Thank you,       Amine Moulay Ramdane.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca