From: m@m.com   
      
   Hello...   
      
      
   Yet more precision about my explanation of my just new proverb about   
   fluid intelligence and smartness..   
      
   I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many   
   scalable algorithms and algorithms..   
      
   Here is my just new proverb:   
      
   "Human smartness is finding a small number of tools that permit to   
   to solve a great number of problems, so when you look carefully at what   
   is human smartness you will notice that it is not about great quantity,   
   it is about a small quantity of good quality that permits us to be so   
   powerful. Being smart is not about quantity, it is much more about quality."   
      
   So i think i am smart and i will explain my new proverb above:   
      
   With pattern recognition of fluid intelligence we are finding   
   patterns that are the tools, and we are understanding and applying those   
   patterns that we are finding with fluid intelligence to   
   other many other new problems, so then we are not finding the patterns   
   again and again, so then we are not finding the tools that are those   
   patterns again and again, so pattern recognition of fluid intelligence   
   is a minimization process that permit to find a small number of tools   
   that permits to solve great number of problems. I think i am smart, and   
   I have to be more precise, so you have to understand that the   
   minimization process above is on the "finding", so when i say in my   
   proverb above: "Human smartness is finding a small number of tools that   
   permit to solve a great number of problems", the "finding a small   
   number" my good abstract thinking and it means that it is a minimization   
   process on the "finding", since we are not "finding" the tools that are   
   the patterns again and again.   
      
   More of my philosophy about human fluid intelligence and smartness..   
      
   Human fluid intelligence involves being able to think and reason   
   abstractly and solve problems, so it needs abstract thinking and pattern   
   recognition, but we have to ask a philosophical question of:   
      
   What is abstract thinking in human fluid intelligence ?   
      
   So i will rapidly answer that abstract thinking is like   
   when in software programming we construct a "class" (that leads to an   
   object in runtime) and its attributes, it is like the way of   
   constructing a "concept" and knowing about what is its characteristics,   
   so abstract thinking is not finding a thing of a particular Huskie Dog   
   and what is its characteristics, but it is finding the general concept   
   of a Dog and its attributes or characteristics, so i think that   
   good abstract thinking is much more powerful, so now i will ask a   
   philosophical question of:   
      
   What is the "relation" in human fluid intelligence between pattern   
   recognition and abstract thinking ?   
      
   I think that i have to define what is pattern recognition in human fluid   
   intelligence, so i will say the following:   
      
   Pattern recognition in human fluid intelligence is to recognize a   
   particular way in which something is done, is organized, or happens, so   
   i think that it is with this pattern recognition that we are able to   
   incrementally understand and we are able to construct concepts etc. so   
   this also permits to do abstract thinking in human fluid intelligence.   
      
   So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid   
   intelligence that permits me to understand, here it is:   
      
   So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country   
   called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?   
      
   It is like my IQ test..   
      
   So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go   
   fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need   
   the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be   
   "reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has   
   too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take   
   into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so   
   you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan   
      
   So that to understand more, let us say that you are measuring a  human   
   IQ, so if it is high human IQ , this value is a measure that is relative   
   to the other human IQs, so you will say that this high IQ is much better   
   at adaptability than the other humans, but it is not correct  measure,   
   because even science and technology have constraints that constrain(or   
   limit greatly) the expressiveness of human IQs, so then we can not say   
   that a high human IQ is better at adaptability than the other humans..   
      
   More philosophy about how to measure human IQ or human smartness..   
      
   I think i am smart, and i will talk about how to measure human IQs or   
   human smartness, first you have to know that you can measure relatively   
   or absolutely, so if you measure the IQ of a human, you will give a   
   value of IQ that is "relative" to the distribution of IQs of humans, so   
   can we ask if it is the right way to measure human IQs? i think it is   
   not, because there is a "very" important thing that is missing, and it   
   is that you have to also measure IQ or smartness relatively to the   
   "constraints" in our reality that constrain(or limit) human IQ or human   
   smartness, and i think this will give a much more realistic measure of   
   human IQs or human smartness, so if you are really smart you will start   
   by searching  what are those constraints in the reality that constrain   
   human IQs or human smartness, because this way you will become really smart.   
      
   Let me give an example about how to measure IQs or smartness..   
      
   So if you are really smart you will give a smart example so that people   
   can understand, so here it is:   
      
   If i say: 2 + 2 = 4   
      
   So you will notice that this equality is also constrained by constraints   
     of reality, since for example you are noticing that it is not so   
   mathematically expressive, so this not mathematically expressive is also   
   constraining human IQ or human smartness, since if you understand and   
   learn this mathematical equality, another person will quickly do the   
   same, so the other person will adapt quickly to this level of smartness,   
   so now you are noticing the smart idea, it is that even  science and   
   technology are constrained the same way, and this  constraints on   
   science and technology constrain or limit the  expressiveness of high   
   human IQs or high level of smartness so that  other lower level human   
   IQs or smartness can attain the level of  adaptability of high human   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)