From: m1@m1.com   
      
   Hello...   
      
      
   More of my philosophy about philosophy and ethics and more..   
      
   I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also   
   invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..   
      
    From what i am understanding by thinking my philosophy is that   
   philosophy about ethics is really interesting, so why it is   
   interesting?, since it is like two engines, since ethics and laws are   
   like engines that pushes the society forward, since laws and ethics   
   permit like to optimize the society, and i think that ethics and laws   
   have also an "identity", since also they can be invented by an inventor   
   of the philosophy or ethic or laws and it makes him better equipped as a   
   personality, so it is a positive energy for him, and it is also a second   
   engine that pushes humanity forward.   
      
   More of my philosophy about philosophy and politics and more..   
      
   I think i am a wise type of person, and i am a man of laws, i mean   
   that i love to think and invent my philosophy and after that to   
   logically infer laws and rules from it, and from what i am doing i am   
   noticing that my kind of doing philosophy is also like how to make work   
   Democracy, since i think that Democracy needs to avoid extremism that   
   hurts Democracy and make it not work correctly, this is how i am doing   
   my philosophy, since the rules or laws that i am inferring from my   
   philosophy have to be not too much "homogenized" static laws in a   
   society, so it is like in Evolutionary algorithms in artificial   
   intelligence, i mean my laws have to avoid extremism that hurts the laws   
   themselves and make them unhealthy, this is why i am also like   
   introducing randomness in my laws like in Evolutionary algorithms by   
   making my laws efficiently flexible and efficiently "adaptative", so   
   when for example you say that the rule or law of Utilitarianism is   
   maximizing happiness and well-being for all affected individuals, it is   
   not a static law that you have to homogenize in a society, since you   
   have to see it or look at it like a dynamic law that is efficiently   
   flexible and adaptative to the envirenment or the context.   
      
   More of my philosophy about Democracy and Utilitarianism and more..   
      
   I think i am a wise type of person, and i will also make you understand   
   another very important thing, and it is that  my redefinition of   
   Utilitarianism below make the rule of Utilitarianism "valid" and "true",   
   since the rule of Utilitarianism that is maximizing happiness and   
   well-being for all affected individuals is also ruled by the future   
   consequences, so since our future consequences must be that we have to   
   be a kind of order in a Democracy that permits Democracy to work, so   
   then we have to "introduce" like a kind of randomness such by logical   
   analogy as randomness of Evolutionary algorithms in artificial   
   intelligence, since to not get stuck in a local minimum we have to not   
   to "homogenize" in the society the rule of Utilitarianism since there is   
   also the weakest members of the society that can not be able to be this   
   maximizing happiness and well-being for all affected individuals, so i   
   think that it is like evolutionary algorithms in artificial   
   intelligence, so we have to be smart when managing and ruling in   
   Democracy. So notice that i have first talked in my below thoughts about   
   the definition of Utilitarianism that doesn't take into account my   
   redefinition below of Utilitarianism that make the rule of   
   Utilitarianism "valid" and "true", and i am after that giving my   
   redefinition of Utilitarianism, so read it again:   
      
   More of my philosophy about Utilitarianism and more..   
      
   So as you are noticing that in my previous post i have talked about what   
   is the best positive energy that make us a much better world, read it   
   below, but am i for Utilitarianism 100% by talking as i am talking about   
   this positive energy ? i will answer that you have to know that   
   Utilitarianism prescribes actions that maximise happiness and well-being   
   for all affected individuals, so i think this "prescribes" means like   
   "recommend", since we are also ruled by Democracy that makes the rule   
   of Utilitarianism compatible with Democracy, so this prescribes is not   
   dictatorship, and this maximize of Utilitarianism is the best way, and   
   you have to also understand my redefinition of Utilitarianism that   
   abstract much more correctly, and here is my redefinition of Utilitarianism:   
      
   More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like   
   an IQ test..   
      
   Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the   
   definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern   
   with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition   
   of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that   
   maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,   
   i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am   
   smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and   
   well-being by well balancing taking into account not   
   only the present but also the future, i mean that responability   
   is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us   
   to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize   
   correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.   
      
   I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and   
   here it is:   
      
   So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid   
   intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:   
      
   So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country   
   called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?   
      
   It is like my IQ test..   
      
   So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go   
   fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need   
   the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be   
   "reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has   
   too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take   
   into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so   
   you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.   
      
   More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..   
      
   I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:   
      
   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism   
      
   So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions   
   that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,   
   but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises   
   happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not   
   only the present but also the future.   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)