From: m1@m1.com   
      
   Hello....   
      
      
   More philosophy about identity of philosophy and ethics and more..   
      
   I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also   
   invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..   
      
   I think i am a wise type of person, and notice again how i will   
   logically infer a rule or law from my philosophy, so look again   
   at what i have just said in the following:   
      
   "From what i am understanding by thinking my philosophy is that   
   philosophy about ethics is really interesting, so why it is   
   interesting?, since it is like two engines, since ethics and laws are   
   like engines that pushes the society forward, since laws and ethics   
   permit like to optimize the society, and i think that ethics and laws   
   have also an "identity", since also they can be invented by an inventor   
   of the philosophy or ethic or laws and it makes him better equipped as a   
   personality, so it is a positive energy for him, and it is also a second   
   engine that pushes humanity forward."   
      
   So notice carefully that i am saying:   
      
   "I think that ethics and laws have also an "identity", since also they   
   can be invented by an inventor of the philosophy or ethic or laws and it   
   makes him better equipped as a personality, so it is a positive energy   
   for him, and it is also a second engine that pushes humanity forward."   
      
   So as you notice that since this "identity" makes the positive energy   
   and make the engine that pushes the inventor forward, so i think that   
   protection with "patents" or the like are a good thing to have since   
   they bring a positive energy and they are an engine that pushes humanity   
   forward. And a patent is a granting of a property right by a sovereign   
   authority to an inventor. This grant provides the inventor exclusive   
   rights to the patented process, design, or invention for a designated   
   period in exchange for a comprehensive disclosure of the invention.   
      
   More of my philosophy about philosophy and ethics and more..   
      
    From what i am understanding by thinking my philosophy is that   
   philosophy about ethics is really interesting, so why it is   
   interesting?, since it is like two engines, since ethics and laws are   
   like engines that pushes the society forward, since laws and ethics   
   permit like to optimize the society, and i think that ethics and laws   
   have also an "identity", since also they can be invented by an inventor   
   of the philosophy or ethic or laws and it makes him better equipped as a   
   personality, so it is a positive energy for him, and it is also a second   
   engine that pushes humanity forward.   
      
   More of my philosophy about philosophy and politics and more..   
      
   I think i am a wise type of person, and i am a man of laws, i mean   
   that i love to think and invent my philosophy and after that to   
   logically infer laws and rules from it, and from what i am doing i am   
   noticing that my kind of doing philosophy is also like how to make work   
   Democracy, since i think that Democracy needs to avoid extremism that   
   hurts Democracy and make it not work correctly, this is how i am doing   
   my philosophy, since the rules or laws that i am inferring from my   
   philosophy have to be not too much "homogenized" static laws in a   
   society, so it is like in Evolutionary algorithms in artificial   
   intelligence, i mean my laws have to avoid extremism that hurts the laws   
   themselves and make them unhealthy, this is why i am also like   
   introducing randomness in my laws like in Evolutionary algorithms by   
   making my laws efficiently flexible and efficiently "adaptative", so   
   when for example you say that the rule or law of Utilitarianism is   
   maximizing happiness and well-being for all affected individuals, it is   
   not a static law that you have to homogenize in a society, since you   
   have to see it or look at it like a dynamic law that is efficiently   
   flexible and adaptative to the envirenment or the context.   
      
   More of my philosophy about Democracy and Utilitarianism and more..   
      
   I think i am a wise type of person, and i will also make you understand   
   another very important thing, and it is that  my redefinition of   
   Utilitarianism below make the rule of Utilitarianism "valid" and "true",   
   since the rule of Utilitarianism that is maximizing happiness and   
   well-being for all affected individuals is also ruled by the future   
   consequences, so since our future consequences must be that we have to   
   be a kind of order in a Democracy that permits Democracy to work, so   
   then we have to "introduce" like a kind of randomness such by logical   
   analogy as randomness of Evolutionary algorithms in artificial   
   intelligence, since to not get stuck in a local minimum we have to not   
   to "homogenize" in the society the rule of Utilitarianism since there is   
   also the weakest members of the society that can not be able to be this   
   maximizing happiness and well-being for all affected individuals, so i   
   think that it is like evolutionary algorithms in artificial   
   intelligence, so we have to be smart when managing and ruling in   
   Democracy. So notice that i have first talked in my below thoughts about   
   the definition of Utilitarianism that doesn't take into account my   
   redefinition below of Utilitarianism that make the rule of   
   Utilitarianism "valid" and "true", and i am after that giving my   
   redefinition of Utilitarianism, so read it again:   
      
   More of my philosophy about Utilitarianism and more..   
      
   So as you are noticing that in my previous post i have talked about what   
   is the best positive energy that make us a much better world, read it   
   below, but am i for Utilitarianism 100% by talking as i am talking about   
   this positive energy ? i will answer that you have to know that   
   Utilitarianism prescribes actions that maximise happiness and well-being   
   for all affected individuals, so i think this "prescribes" means like   
   "recommend", since we are also ruled by Democracy that makes the rule   
   of Utilitarianism compatible with Democracy, so this prescribes is not   
   dictatorship, and this maximize of Utilitarianism is the best way, and   
   you have to also understand my redefinition of Utilitarianism that   
   abstract much more correctly, and here is my redefinition of Utilitarianism:   
      
   More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like   
   an IQ test..   
      
   Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the   
   definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern   
   with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition   
   of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that   
   maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,   
   i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)