From: m1@m1.com   
      
   Hello...   
      
      
      
   More of my philosophy about entropy and about mathematics and about   
   artificial intelligence and more..   
      
   I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also   
   invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..   
      
      
   I think i am smart, and notice carefully what i have just said:   
      
   "I think i am smart, and i say that the way of evolutionary algorithms   
   in artificial intelligence is not the right way since it starts from   
   like the low level layers and it is by logical analogy like circular   
   reasoning, since when you start from like the low level layers like in   
   evolutionary algorithms you need a way to construct a more and more   
   difficult objective function that permit the reward , so it needs more   
   and more smartness so it is like circular reasoning, so i think that the   
   much better way is the way of COMET (short for “commonsense   
   transformers”) that is capable of common sense reasoning, since it is   
   like an emulation that incorporates smartness of humans, so it doesn't   
   start from like the low level layers, so read about it below so that to   
   understand my thoughts and views"   
      
   So i think that it is by logical analogy like the philophical question of:   
      
   Is mathematics discovered or invented ?   
      
      
   So i am really smart, and i will say that there is what we call entropy,   
   so it can be disorder, but mathematics that we discover is not disorder,   
   but it is also not like a sophisticated human language that we talk, so   
   then we can say that mathematics is discovered as not like higher   
   smartness of a sophisticated language that we talk, but it is also   
   invented like a higher smartness sophisticated language that we talk, so   
   then you are understanding my logical analogy with artificial   
   intelligence, that evolutionary algorithms need an   
   objective function that permits the reward, but this objective function   
   needs to be sophisticated like higher smartness of a sophisticated   
   language that we talk to permit general artificial intelligence, so it   
   is like a circular reasoning, since it needs to be organized like a   
   sophisticated smartness and this is not in accordance with the system of   
   natural evolution , since the system of natural evolution that creates   
   human brain was mostly not a sophisticated smartness of the objective   
   function that permit general artificial intelligence.   
      
   More of my philosophy about common sense reasoning and about artificial   
   intelligence and more..   
      
      
      
      
   I think i am smart, and i say that the way of evolutionary algorithms in   
   artificial intelligence is not the right way since it starts from like   
   the low level layers and it is by logical analogy like circular   
   reasoning, since when you start from like the low level layers like in   
   evolutionary algorithms you need a way to construct a more and more   
   difficult objective function that permit the reward , so it needs more   
   and more smartness so it is like circular reasoning, so i think that the   
   much better way is the way of COMET (short for “commonsense   
   transformers”) that is capable of common sense reasoning, since it is   
   like an emulation that incorporates smartness of humans, so it doesn't   
   start from like the low level layers, so read about it below so that to   
   understand my thoughts and   
   views:   
      
   I think i am smart, and i say that in the biologic there is what we call   
   the "useful" for the biological, so the environment is dependent on   
   the genetical diversity, so this being useful in the environment is also   
   the engine that pushes towards better and better quality, so how can   
   you emulate it in artificial intelligence? so how can you emulate water   
   or food that is useful for the biological that permit the apparition of   
   the bigger and bigger brain ? so you are noticing that i am abstracting   
   below by saying in the following that the wanting the useful depends on   
   the environment of the biological that contains the useful:   
      
      
   More of my philosophy about general artificial intelligence and   
   about evolutionary algorithms and more..   
      
   I think i am smart, and i say that there the two ways   
   that permit to construct general artificial intelligence,   
   there is the evolutionary way with evolutionary algorithms and   
   there is like the way that i am talking about it below that   
   is COMET (short for “commonsense transformers”) or the like,   
   i think the evolutionary way like with PSO or neuroevolution   
   algorithms or genetic algorithms is the way that has to maintain   
   "diversity" of the population and it has, and it is the most important   
   thing in artificial intelligence, to create a kind of function that   
   plays the role of the objective function that permits to optimise with a   
   "reward", and by logical analogy, it looks like the requirement   
   to wanting the useful and the wanting of being of higher quality in the   
   natural evolution process that makes the highly better and complex   
   objects such as humans and the human brain, so i think that in   
   artificial intelligence the most difficult part is how to "emulate" this   
   characteristics of the biologic that is genetically equipped with   
   the wanting the useful and wanting to be of or wanting the higher   
   quality, so then you will say that it is part of the diversification   
   process of the evolutionary algorithm, but what i want to explain that   
   the most difficult problem is how to create those kind of   
   characteristics that are biological in artificial intelligence,  since   
   the problem is not creating diversity, but it is how to create a kind of   
   diversity that is part of the biologic that permit to be the wanting the   
   useful and wanting to be of or wanting the higher quality, since i say   
   that the requirement of such a difficult objective function that permits   
   the reward is the most difficult part, so i think that abstracting by   
   saying that the evolutionary algorithms need diversification and the   
   the kind of natural selection or objective function is not correct   
   abstraction.   
      
   And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary   
   algorithms in artificial intelligence so that you understand more:   
      
   https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0   
      
   And read my following thoughts of my philosophy about what is smartness:   
      
   https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Wzf6AOl41xs   
      
   And you can read more about my education and my way of doing here:   
      
   Here is more proof of the fact that i have invented many scalable   
   algorithms and algorithms:   
      
   https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/V9Go8fbF10k   
      
   And you can take a look at my photo that i have just put   
   here in my website(I am 53 years old):   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)