From: m1@m1.com   
      
   Hello...   
      
      
      
   More of my philosophy about societal and individual identity and more of   
   my thoughts..   
      
   I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also   
   invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..   
      
      
   I think i am smart, and i think that societal identity can not come   
   from the being rich or having big money, and i think that the societal   
   identity is much more important than individual identity, since it is   
   the very basis for societal order, since the being diversity of this one   
   is rich and that one is not rich or is poor brings a kind of societal   
   disorder and violence, since this kind of being unequal is not liked by   
   people, so this is why i say that it is primordial to compensate it with   
   a kind of being "decency" that maintain order in a society, and this   
   kind of decency is, as i am saying it below, also the fact that we   
   standardize with laws and rules so that to bring order.   
      
   More of my philosophy of what is the Western values and about the laws   
   and more..   
      
   I have to clear something really important about laws, and here is what   
   i will say:   
      
   Western countries have wanted to avoid the radical form, where we have   
   to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and   
   large-scale social engineering as in old communist China or USSR(United   
   Socialist Soviet Republic), since i think this way of doing has not   
   worked so efficiently, so i think that western countries have given to   
   there people human rights and freedom of expression or speech as   
   Liberty, but i think they are not definitive rights, since i think that   
   Western countries are proceeding by rational reforms into the society   
   and then to undertake evidence-based assessments, so then they are also   
   monitoring those western rights to see if they are working correctly or   
   not, so if they are not working correctly , so they can change them, so   
   then from my previous thoughts about nationalism and about the laws you   
   are also understanding the a kind of decency that brings order is so   
   important for the society.   
      
   Read my previous thoughts so that to understand:   
      
   More of my philosophy about nationalism and about the laws and more..   
      
   I think i am smart, since i think that the laws that we enforce and   
   the kind of soft power that we softly enforce like by making them   
   rules that we explain is the constraints that makes the basis of   
   americanism as a nationalism of USA, since speaking and writing english   
   can become a law too if it is necessary, so you will say why not the   
   culture ? but the culture is the expression of the diversity of the   
   population, but the laws and the soft power as soft rules is what   
   "standardize" and makes the the basis of the americanism of USA that i   
   say is the nationalism of USA.   
      
   This is why i also just said the following:   
      
   More of my philosophy of is USA nationalism or patriotism..   
      
   I think that Donald Trump has not brought nationalism to USA, since i   
   think that USA is a kind of nationalism that is not hard nationalism,   
   since USA is a kind of americanism that is a kind of nationalism that is   
   more softer than the one of president Putin, so what is the most   
   important thing in americanism of USA ? i think it is the fact that it   
   also comes from this USA americanism that maintain a kind of order by   
   standardizing by being a mixture of laws that we enforce and by faith in   
   God and a kind of soft power that brings a kind of decency that is an   
   americanism that brings order, so i am saying it like this since   
   the most important part in americanism of USA is how to be an acceptable   
   society by being the right order.   
      
   More of my philosophy about president Putin and about the war in Ukraine..   
      
   I think i am smart, and i think that saying that president Putin is the   
   only one responsable is not correct thinking, and what we have to do   
   is think more efficiently and to try to understand nationalism of   
   president Putin, so we have to ask a question of is nationalism of   
   president Putin too much dictatorial and too much extremist and why is   
   it too much dictatorial and too much extremist, since we can easily   
   notice that the kind of too much dictatorial and extremist nationalism   
   of Putin is not the kind of nationalism of the nationalist Union for a   
   Popular Movement that is centre-right political party in France, so then   
   you are understanding that there is hard and archaic nationalism like in   
   Algeria and Russia and Syria and of the one of Marine Le Pen , and there   
   is more appropriate nationalism like nationalist Union for a Popular   
   Movement that is centre-right political party in France, so then you are   
   noticing where is the defect of nationalism of Putin, since i think that   
   nationalism of Putin is partly an archaism that has to be improved by   
   making it look like nationalist Union for a Popular Movement that is   
   centre-right political party in France, but we have to   
   be careful since we have also to take into account the internal context   
   of what has happened in Russia that has created this kind of too much   
   dictatorial and extremist nationalism of president Putin.   
      
   More of my philosophy about human diversity..   
      
   I think i am smart, and i think that one of the most important   
   thing in philosophy is to speak about what is the acceptable human   
   diversity, so i think that what we are trying to do in the societies is   
   that we are also standardizing by using laws, i mean the law doesn't   
   accept all human diversities, and also we have to know that there is   
   soft power and hard power, and the hard power is the laws that we are   
   enforcing, and there is also soft power that we have to use so that   
   to be an acceptable society, this is why i say that having an acceptable   
   society is also knowing how to have smart and wise laws and how to be   
   wisely and proactively a soft power that construct an acceptable society   
   that doesn't degenerate into an unacceptable society. And it is   
   how i am doing it by also inventing many poems of Love and poems so   
   that to be in accordance with my following new proverb, so read them below:   
      
   I think i am really smart, and i am also an inventor of many proverbs,   
   and here is my just new proverb:   
      
   "We can easily hate our world, and look at the destruction that just   
   happened quickly in Ukraine and you will notice it quickly, so hate   
   becomes by logical analogy like an animal instinct that we have to   
   control wisely, it is why we have to know how to be constructive so that   
   to make our world more beautiful so that we become much less destructive   
   because of hate."   
      
   More of my philosophy about my inventions and about my kind of personality..   
      
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)