From: q21@q1.com   
      
   Hello...   
      
      
      
   Read again, i correct about more of my philosophy about is Adam Smith a   
   philosopher or an economist and more of my thoughts..   
      
   I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also   
   invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..   
      
      
   I think i am highly smart, and i say that when you understand much more   
   deeply Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, you will notice   
   that he is much more a philosopher than an economist, since i am   
   noticing rapidly his kind of philosophy, since as i am explaining in my   
   below thoughts, he is showing how individual egoism gives rise or   
   creates societal or group egoism and how both individual egoism and   
   societal egoism or group egoism give rise or creates competition and how   
   competition regulates the economic activity, and how competition   
   is based on profit, and how competition must be smart by attracting with   
   a big profit so that to favor growth, and favor a good allocation of   
   resources and, ultimately, innovation, and of course his model   
   also speaks about how Adam Smith argued that profits flowed from capital   
   investments, and that capital gets directed to where the most profit can   
   be made, and i think that as competition , this idea is central to   
   capitalism, since i think that it also favors growth and favors a good   
   allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation, and it looks like   
   the why we have to be financial capitalism too, since i say about it the   
   following:   
      
   The biggest benefit of finance, is to provide opportunities to people,   
   in the sense that in a world where there is no finance, the only way to   
   start a company is to be born rich or to have saved for a long time. In   
   a world where finance works well, the people with talent can actually   
   start firms and reach their dreams without waiting to either have saved   
   the money, or be lucky and receive it from their parents, and once you   
   create this opportunity, you will have the most talented people take   
   advantage of those opportunities, which favors growth, which favors a   
   good allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation.   
      
   And of course i say that we have not to be pessimistic, since we have   
   always to take into account the very important fact that capitalism is   
   not a zero sum game, since with a "reasonable" level of growth,   
   capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still   
   ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital.   
      
      
   Read my previous thoughts:   
      
   More of my philosophy about more of my views about Adam Smith model and   
   more of my thoughts..   
      
   I think i am highly smart, and i say that you have to understand more   
   deeply Adam Smith model, i mean that it is a generality and it comes   
   with conditionalities such as a "good competition" means also that   
   a local zone like the European union or local region such as a country   
   have to have a good diversification of the economy so that to be a   
   resilient economy that works correctly, so as you notice that Adam Smith   
   is not speaking about the being good diversification of the economy,   
   since his model, as i am explaining it, is an abstract generalization,   
   also it is also an abstract generalization when competition means the   
   existence of a good competition as different economic competitors that   
   compete and that offer the good choices of products and services.   
      
   More of my philosophy about the model of Adam Smith and more of my   
   thoughts..   
      
   I think i am highly smart, and i think that Adam Smith is really   
   highly smart too, since in my logical proof below of how to understand   
   the following saying of Adam Smith:   
      
   "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"   
      
   We can say that when we say a "good competition" , it also means a good   
   diversification of the economy that makes the economy resilient,   
   so then this makes the Adam Smith model from the above saying correct,   
   so then here is the rest of my logical proof that explains the above saying:   
      
   I think i am highly smart, and i think what he means is that it is from   
   individual human egoism or self-interest that comes solidarity and   
   cooperation and collaboration, as i am explaining in my thoughts below,   
   and it can become an egoism as a group of solidarity or/and cooperation   
   or/and collaboration against the other group, but it can also become a   
   universal solidarity and/or cooperation and/or collaboration, so then   
   this egoism as an individual or as a group creates competition, and   
   competition does regulate economic activity, so then i say that it is   
   the model of Adam Smith, and as you notice that in the model of Adam   
   Smith, egoism is the engine and the cause of properity and happiness of   
   nations.   
      
   Read my previous thoughts:   
      
      
   More precision of my philosophy about the Adam Smith idea about   
   competition is the regulator of economic activity and more of my thoughts..   
      
      
   I think i am highly smart, and i am quickly understanding Adam Smith   
   architectural idea of: competition regulates the economic activity,   
   since i think that his model speaks about competition in a global world,   
   so he is like proving in a general way, but the world is not organized   
   in such a way, since the world is organized in zones like European union   
   or like countries, so when Adam Smith says that competition is the   
   regulator of economic activity , he also means that competition has to   
   exist as a first condition, so if competition exists , he then says   
   that competition can be the regulator of economic activity, but i think   
   that it is not true, since there is still a missing part, since what i   
   have just said that competition is not sufficient, since we have   
   to have a good "diversification" of the economy that makes the economy   
   "resilient".   
      
   More of my philosophy about the holistic view of competition and more   
   of my thoughts..   
      
   I think i am highly smart, and so that to understand my thoughts below   
   about competition in capitalism and economic Liberalism, look carefully   
   of how i am explaining below the how competition fights efficiently   
   corruption, so it is thus like inherent to my explanation that   
   competition creates cooperation or collaboration inside the group that   
   compete against another group, so it is not just black or white, since   
   as you notice that the model becomes much more clear, and that the point   
   of view of of Adam Smith, the father of economic Liberalism, is also   
   true, since i think that, in his views, competition indirectly creates   
   cooperation and collaboration, and we can logically infer that the view   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)