Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.culture.scottish    |    More than just Haggis & overt cheapness    |    99,776 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 97,824 of 99,776    |
|    gyansorova@gmail.com to Adam Whyte-Settlar    |
|    Re: Renewable energy overtakes nuclear a    |
|    29 Nov 14 17:32:59    |
      On Sunday, November 30, 2014 12:19:12 AM UTC+13, Adam Whyte-Settlar wrote:       > as storage is its not possible, with the       > > exception of limited hydro, to store their energy.        >        > Of course storage is possible.       > It's been possible for decades.       > If anything the problem is there are so many competing systems for storage       that a market leader has yet to emerge from the dogfight - but it's just a       matter of time. The current best option is the established pumped hydro       storage but there are lots of        others being developed.       > The technology is leaping forwards on an almost monthly basis these days.       > The wearisome 'windmills don't work when it's not windy" really is pathetic       'denial for dummies' stuff you know.       > It's not like we have a choice - we either develop renewables rapid or the       lights go out. Nuclear is a total non-starter for all the obvious reasons.              Storage I am afraid is very limited and usually consists of pumping water up a       hill, which in itself is a lossy process. You can make it work of course like       anything at an expense.                     Wind-energy storage is a new technology, but it is showing great promise in       real-world renewable energy applications. The most prominent example is Xcel       Energy's Wind-to-Battery project initiated in 2009 and based in Luverne,       Minn., at the 11.5-MW        MinWind Energy LLC wind plant. This project was intended to help address       questions about what storage can do to integrate renewable energy generation       in a real-world context. The project used a 1.0 MW (7.2-MWh) sodium-sulfur, or       NaS, battery-based system        connected to the grid via an S&C PureWave storage management system, which       managed battery charging and discharging.       The project has demonstrated that energy storage can be effective in       delivering a wide variety of functions, including time-shifting energy, wind       smoothing, and dispatched wind-leveling. Batteries were also evaluated for       frequency regulation capabilities.       Despite wind variability, the project demonstrated that it needs a relatively       small amount of power and energy to better integrate a wind plant with the       power grid. For instance, roughly 15 to 20% of a wind plant's nameplate power       rating and just 2 to 3        hours of battery storage makes the wind plant look like a traditional       dispatchable resource.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca