From: ce11son@yahoo.ca   
      
   On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 11:10:57 +0000 (UTC), soupdragon    
   wrote:   
      
   >Charles Ellson  wrote in   
   >news:f07k7a9tdde6fltrs1s87ab1hf41tlkb16@4ax.com:   
   >   
   >> On Sat, 29 Nov 2014 19:03:14 +0000 (UTC), soupdragon    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>Adam Whyte-Settlar  wrote in   
   >>>news:c6e66005-7210-4c1b-9de1-f3a1d259f9cb@googlegroups.com:   
   >>>   
   >>>> as storage is its not possible, with the   
   >>>>> exception of limited hydro, to store their energy.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Of course storage is possible.   
   >>>> It's been possible for decades   
   >>>   
   >>>Really?   
   >>>   
   >>>> If anything the problem is there are so many competing systems for   
   >>>> storage that a market leader has yet to emerge from the dogfight -   
   >but   
   >>>> it's just a matter of time. The current best option is the   
   >established   
   >>>> pumped hydro storage   
   >>>   
   >>>Biggest pumped storge scheme in the UK is in Wales.   
   >>>   
   >> Scotland acksherly. Cruachan with 10 GWh/11.3 Mm^3, Dinorwig has 9.1   
   >> GWh/6.7 Mm^3. Foyers has more water stored (13.6 Mm^3) but with less   
   >> head; Dinorwig has the highest output at 1.8 GW.   
   >   
   >OK. I stand corrected, but the point still stands.   
   >   
   >>>It can supply North Wales at normal consumption for 18 hours   
   >>>   
   >> But tends to get used (along with Foyers) to supply *ngland for a few   
   >> minutes when people go for a leak and/or put the kettle on at the end   
   >> of Coronation Street and E Stenders.   
   >   
   >Which, of course, is where hydro is at its best - dealing with short   
   >term surges in demand.   
   >   
   So SBB use it only for short uphill spurts ?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)