From: pj@jostle.com   
      
   On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:55:57 -0500, "conway caine"   
    wrote:   
      
   >   
   >   
   >"Peter Jason"  wrote in message   
   >news:oecs8a5uf9sac3hplgefvlrcbr1i0ukipd@4ax.com...   
   >On Sun, 14 Dec 2014 14:30:05 -0500, "conway caine"   
   >>"JeffreyHamilton"  wrote in message news:m6kffo$jn9$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>   
   >>It will be interesting to see how the lower price will affect the "oil   
   >>sands" projects in Canada. I gather the breakeven point is approximetly $70   
   >>dollars a barrel and it's $65 for the American "oil shale" extraction   
   >>process.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>***When are they going to build the blipping pipeline? This American   
   >>finagling is past all understanding. A pipeline from Canada to Texas is not   
   >>going to destroy Western civilization as we know it.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   >Yet the Wall St paper-shufflers almost did.   The same lot are still   
   >extant just gearing up for another try.   
   >   
   >*****Wherein lies the problem here, Peter? Are railroad tank cards and   
   >trucks really a safer alternative for the transportation of oil? More to the   
   >point, do we have safer alternatives to fossil fuel? We cannot survive if we   
   >park all our vehicles and then be off gamboling down the highways and   
   >byways, celebrating the great Green Revolution.   
      
   They could always build an undersea pipeline following the coastline.   
   They have fancy undersea gougers to dig a trench and therein bury the   
   pipe.   Rather like communication cables.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)