From: spscott1@gmail.com   
      
   On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:49:38 -0500, "JeffreyHamilton"   
    wrote:   
      
   >conway caine wrote:   
   >> "JeffreyHamilton"  wrote in message news:m6kffo$jn9$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>   
   >> It will be interesting to see how the lower price will affect the "oil   
   >> sands" projects in Canada. I gather the breakeven point is   
   >> approximetly $70 dollars a barrel and it's $65 for the American "oil   
   >> shale" extraction process.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> ***When are they going to build the blipping pipeline? This American   
   >> finagling is past all understanding. A pipeline from Canada to Texas   
   >> is not going to destroy Western civilization as we know it.   
   >   
   >Dunno, can they be trusted to both build and operate it in a manner   
   >consistant with public safety ? Past practice show's that not to be the   
   >case. The first iteration of the Keystone XL pipeline, not only crossed over   
   >the Ogallala Aquifer, evidently the 3rd largest aquifer in the US. The   
   >original plan also called for the experimental usage of both a thinner   
   >walled pipe, and at a higher that usual pressure....Gee,what could possibly   
   >go wrong with that plan ?   
   >   
   >  cheers....Jeff   
      
   So you think railroads are safer?   
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lac-M%C3%A9gantic_rail_disaster   
      
   The pipeline wont have any effect on Global Warming according to about 5   
   (five) reports commissioned by Obama. The oil extracted will get burned   
   whether in the US, cleanest or China not so clean take your pick, besides,   
   Warren Buffett doesn't need any more money,   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)