XPost: soc.culture.british, rec.arts.drwho, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho   
   From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca   
      
   In article ,   
   Psychotic Chicken   wrote:   
   >In message , The Doctor   
   > writes   
   >>In article ,   
   >>Psychotic Chicken   wrote:   
   >>>In message , The Doctor   
   >>> writes   
   >>>>In article ,   
   >>>>Psychotic Chicken   wrote:   
   >>>>>In message , The Doctor   
   >>>>> writes   
   >>>>>>In article <+rvlOOBu08NVFwCB@btinternet.com>,   
   >>>>>>Psychotic Chicken   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>In message , The Doctor   
   >>>>>>> writes   
   >>>>>>>>In article   
   >>>>>>>><1304999053451375521.152209mike-xenocyte.com@news.individual.net>,   
   >>>>>>>>Mike M   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>The Doctor  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>>>>>> The Doctor  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Language cleaned up for appropriate audiences.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Corrected newsgroup line.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Got to say, Dave, I'm surprised at you embracing your inner rebel so   
   >>>>>>>>>completely.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>To post something that is so in favour of gay sex, so full of   
   >>>>>>>>>obscene   
   >>>>>>>>>language you usually elide or bowdlerise, that embraces public   
   >>>>>>>>>buggery so   
   >>>>>>>>>enthusiastically (even if it is with Carole Ann Ford).   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Did you READ this little unholy marriage between Viz and The   
   >>>>>>>>>Onion? Or did   
   >>>>>>>>>you just read the header line and assume, quite spectacularly   
   >>>>>>>>>wrongly, that   
   >>>>>>>>>it supported your paranoid delusions about RTD?   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>Oi!  Let the cowards not get away!   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Which cowards are you referring to Dave?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Those that post in soc.cultjure and do not let the drwho'ers not know   
   >>>>>>their view.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Interesting statement.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>So are you saying they aren't entitled to their opinions or that we   
   >>>>>would be horrified at their opinions and be forced to act on our   
   >>>>>disgust.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>I guess the latter seeing as you obviously don't agree with their   
   >>>>>opinions.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Whatever the case,  let the truth be made known   
   >>>>and do not hide.   
   >>>   
   >>>Dave, what do you think is going to happen based on the other times you   
   >>>have done this?   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >>Either confront or run.   
   >   
   >You forgot ... and I think this is the most likely option ... ignore.   
   >   
      
   That falls under the run category.   
      
   >   
   >--   
   >
sychotic hicken   
   >   
   >   
   >bill is man. you: are not. :|   
   >mikeythearchangel    
   >   
   >---   
   >This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus   
   protection is active.   
   >http://www.avast.com   
   >   
      
      
   --   
   Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici do   
   tor@@nl2k.ab.ca   
   God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!   
   http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k  Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism   
   Alberta time to save the province from corruption! Vote Liberal on 5 May 2015!!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)