XPost: soc.culture.british, rec.arts.drwho, uk.media.tv.sf.drwho   
   From: Bill@btinternet.com   
      
   In message , The Doctor   
    writes   
   >In article ,   
   >Psychotic Chicken   wrote:   
   >>In message , The Doctor   
   >> writes   
   >>>In article ,   
   >>>Psychotic Chicken   wrote:   
   >>>>In message , The Doctor   
   >>>> writes   
   >>>>>In article ,   
   >>>>>Psychotic Chicken   wrote:   
   >>>>>>In message , The Doctor   
   >>>>>> writes   
   >>>>>>>In article <+rvlOOBu08NVFwCB@btinternet.com>,   
   >>>>>>>Psychotic Chicken   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>In message , The Doctor   
   >>>>>>>> writes   
   >>>>>>>>>In article   
   >>>>>>>>><1304999053451375521.152209mike-xenocyte.com@news.individual.net>,   
   >>>>>>>>>Mike M   wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>The Doctor  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> In article ,   
   >>>>>>>>>>> The Doctor  wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> Language cleaned up for appropriate audiences.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Corrected newsgroup line.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>Got to say, Dave, I'm surprised at you embracing your inner rebel so   
   >>>>>>>>>>completely.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>To post something that is so in favour of gay sex, so full of   
   >>>>>>>>>>obscene   
   >>>>>>>>>>language you usually elide or bowdlerise, that embraces public   
   >>>>>>>>>>buggery so   
   >>>>>>>>>>enthusiastically (even if it is with Carole Ann Ford).   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>Did you READ this little unholy marriage between Viz and The   
   >>>>>>>>>>Onion? Or did   
   >>>>>>>>>>you just read the header line and assume, quite spectacularly   
   >>>>>>>>>>wrongly, that   
   >>>>>>>>>>it supported your paranoid delusions about RTD?   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>Oi!  Let the cowards not get away!   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>Which cowards are you referring to Dave?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>Those that post in soc.cultjure and do not let the drwho'ers not know   
   >>>>>>>their view.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>Interesting statement.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>So are you saying they aren't entitled to their opinions or that we   
   >>>>>>would be horrified at their opinions and be forced to act on our   
   >>>>>>disgust.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>I guess the latter seeing as you obviously don't agree with their   
   >>>>>>opinions.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>Whatever the case,  let the truth be made known   
   >>>>>and do not hide.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>Dave, what do you think is going to happen based on the other times you   
   >>>>have done this?   
   >>>>   
   >>>   
   >>>Either confront or run.   
   >>   
   >>You forgot ... and I think this is the most likely option ... ignore.   
   >>   
   >   
   >That falls under the run category.   
   >   
   I doubt if the people ignoring the message would see it that way.   
      
      
   --   
   
sychotic hicken   
      
      
   bill is man. you: are not. :|   
   mikeythearchangel    
      
   ---   
   This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus   
   protection is active.   
   http://www.avast.com   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)