From: ce11son@yahoo.ca   
      
   On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 23:07:47 +0000 (UTC), Louis Epstein   
    wrote:   
      
   >In alt.talk.royalty soupdragon  wrote:   
   >> Louis Epstein  wrote in   
   >> news:mhpn2l$3gf$1@reader1.panix.com:   
   >>   
   >>> In alt.talk.royalty soupdragon  wrote:   
   >>>> Louis Epstein  wrote in news:mhc0ie$la2$1   
   >>>> @reader1.panix.com:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>>> So why cross post it to scs, where their 'relevance' is no more   
   >>>>>>>> than any other Scot killed in the wars? What, in particular,   
   >>>>>>>> merits their 'adoration' by you over any other Scot who also died   
   >>>>>>>> but you fail to salute?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> I post it to the soc.culture groups of the nationalities of all   
   >>>>>>> the men listed.It represent the intersection of the groups to   
   >>>>>>> which it is cross-posted.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> You didn't answer the question. Let me repeat it for you:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> What, in particular, merits their 'adoration' by you over any other   
   >>>>>> Scot who also died but you fail to salute?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> I did answer the question.They are the Scots relevant to a.t.r,   
   >>>>> from which this is cross-posted.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> No you didn't. You answered an entirely different question. I didn't   
   >>>> ask you why it was relevant to a.t.r. Try again.   
   >>>   
   >>> If they didn't represent the intersection of relevance to both s.c.s   
   >>> and a.t.r I wouldn't be cross-posting to the two groups.   
   >>   
   >> Explain the relevance to s.c.s.   
   >   
   >Already done.   
   >Do you have problems realizing that people relevant to a.t.r   
   >can also be relevant to s.c.s?   
   >   
   Do you have a problem realising you're not welcome in s.c.s ?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)