Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.genealogy.britain    |    Genealogy in Great Britain and the islan    |    130,039 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 128,061 of 130,039    |
|    Jenny M Benson to All    |
|    Re: strikers in census?    |
|    20 Apr 18 13:38:58    |
      From: nemonews@hotmail.co.uk              On 20-Apr-18 10:45 AM, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:       > Thanks all for replies: it seems the general consensus is that it is       > just a clarification of what William was actually _doing_ in the smithy.       >       > But (only if you're interested!) do have a look at the image: I think       > you'll see what I mean that Miner, Miner, and Striker seem to have been       > added afterwards - though possibly by the same hand. They look a little       > blacker and offset a little.              In my experience, it's not unusual for the enumerator to "clarify" an       occupation. Whether statistics were gathered from the earlier censuses       that required some standardisation of occupation names I don't know.              One example which springs immediately to mind because I have seen it       very recently was where "domestic" was inserted before "Coachman".              --       Jenny M Benson       http://jennygenes.blogspot.co.uk/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca