Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.genealogy.britain    |    Genealogy in Great Britain and the islan    |    130,039 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 128,065 of 130,039    |
|    Steven Gibbs to Jenny M Benson    |
|    Re: Censuses: does there have to _be_ a     |
|    20 Apr 18 15:37:58    |
      From: stevenng5@sgibbs1.freeserve.co.uk              On 20/04/2018 13:57, Jenny M Benson wrote:       >       > I have FREQUENTLY found that Ancestry's transcripts have included a       > household with the previous one when there was no Head recorded, thus       > producing a transcription such as:       >       > Jones, John - Head       > Jones, Ann - Wife       > Jones, Mary - Daughter       > Jones, Edward - Son       > Smith, Elizabeth - Wife       > Smith, - Lizzie - Daughter              I believe the software changed the transcript automatically for much of       the 1891 census (it didn't happen on the very earliest counties). It       changed the surname of "daughter", "wife" or similar, to that of the       previous head, whether or not that head was in the same household. Once       done, it couldn't, apparently, be undone.              Steven              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca