Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.genealogy.britain    |    Genealogy in Great Britain and the islan    |    130,039 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 128,066 of 130,039    |
|    Steven Gibbs to Jenny M Benson    |
|    Re: strikers in census?    |
|    20 Apr 18 15:39:38    |
      From: stevenng5@sgibbs1.freeserve.co.uk              On 20/04/2018 13:52, Jenny M Benson wrote:       >       > I've now followed up the reference and it's an interesting page. I       > DON'T think the words Miner or Striker were later additions, but I       > puzzled for a while over the "C above" and "C below" and also noticed       > that some words (such as "Butcher") were underlined and some (such as       > Dressmaker) underline but with an upstroke through the word. I came to       > the conclusion that all these marks were for classifying occupations       > according to some standard list and that the normal underlining meant       > something like "look/file under Butcher, not under Journey Butcher" or       > "look/file under Hewer, not under Coal Hewer or Miner." The different       > underlining I think indicated that the occupation should be recorded or       > as "Dress Maker" or "Black Smith." And finally I think the "C above"       > and "C below" were indicating mining occupations which were either above       > or below ground.              I agree. I'm sure it's about statistical classification.              Steven              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca