Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.genealogy.britain    |    Genealogy in Great Britain and the islan    |    130,039 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 128,157 of 130,039    |
|    Chris Dickinson to Ian Goddard    |
|    Re: Two workers on the same database.    |
|    26 Apr 18 09:21:15    |
      From: chris@dickinson.uk.net              On Thursday, 26 April 2018 16:34:19 UTC+1, Ian Goddard wrote:       > What you really need is something        > geared to storing events (A married B, C is father of D) without having        > to commit to deciding that A and C are the same person before being able        > to fit B and D into the database.              That's a fairly simple thing to do in a database.              For instance, you create a (dynamic) list of names (John Smith, Elizabeth       Bloggs, etc.) with a (dynamic) sublist of actual individuals for both. All of       these have a unique ID number. Similarly in the tree, each node has a       (dynamic) sublist of potentials        with those IDs. And then you add a decision process to judge who comes first       or who can't be in the sublist              The problem with this comes not so much from memory space but from the ability       of the database to access the quantity of data in an efficient and timely way.              Chris              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca