home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   soc.genealogy.britain      Genealogy in Great Britain and the islan      130,039 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 128,158 of 130,039   
   john to All   
   Re: Two workers on the same database.   
   26 Apr 18 20:00:55   
   
   From: john1@s145802280.onlinehome.fr   
      
   On 26/04/2018 15:55, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:   
   > I thought it would be an interesting discussion to how people go about   
   > two (or more) people working on the same database.   
   >   
   > This is regardless of which genealogy software is in use.   
   >   
   > I suppose one way is to store (or at least share) it in the cloud   
   > somewhere; personally I don't like the cloud, (a) because I don't   
   > consider it reliable, (b) I'm not too sure who has access to it, but   
   > even if you _do_ do that, you need to agree who is working on it when;   
   > if, say, two people are working on different parts of it (they're   
   > pursuing different lines, maybe because they're in different parts of   
   > the country [or world!]), they need some way of combining what they've   
   > found/added. By cloud, I include general cloud (such as dropbox), and   
   > specific genealogy ones (such as an Ancestry tree).   
   >   
   > Brother's Keeper has the facility to compare two similar databases (or   
   > versions of the same one), and highlight differences, allowing you to   
   > move/merge/whatever facts and people from one to the other; I presume   
   > some other softwares have something similar. This does mean both   
   > participants have to go through this process, though, and presumably   
   > they'll still end up with different databases: if, say, they each start   
   > with 100 or 1000 people, and each add 5, then in person A's case, he   
   > will have his additions as numbers 101 to 105 and his co-worker's   
   > additions as 106 to 110, and person B will have the opposite.   
   >   
   > I know moderately distant cousins won't _necessarily_ consider this a   
   > problem: they probably are extending the database - at least, the modern   
   > end - differently anyway, not being _that_ interested in their cousin's   
   > close family. But say a couple of brothers (or siblings) are both   
   > working on different lines of their common tree: say they both take   
   > their holidays around the same time, but go to different places, where   
   > they research the line that is in that locality. How do they merge their   
   > results.   
   >   
   > I _suspect_ it's an intractable problem, especially where (or at least   
   > more so where) the two (or more) participants use different software.   
   >   
   > I don't have a solution; I just thought it'd be an interesting   
   > discussion to have.   
   >   
   > [I don't have the problem _much_ myself - my brother lets me do it all   
   > for our family. And other cousins keep their own, different except where   
   > we overlap, trees.]   
      
      
   History Research Environment (HRE) the software being developed   
   following the demise of The Master Genealogist (TMG) has a stated aim of   
   having:   
   "later extensions for a multi-user client server configuration when   
   required." https://historyresearchenvironment.org/news/   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca