Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.genealogy.britain    |    Genealogy in Great Britain and the islan    |    130,039 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 128,563 of 130,039    |
|    Chris Dickinson to David Marshall    |
|    Re: Witness to wedding    |
|    31 Jul 18 14:29:41    |
      From: chris@dickinson.uk.net              On Monday, 30 July 2018 15:25:10 UTC+1, David Marshall wrote:       > On 30/07/2018 11:28, Chris Pitt Lewis wrote:       > > On 30/07/2018 10:41, David Marshall wrote:       > >> On 29/07/2018 15:37, Doug Laidlaw wrote:       > >>> On 27/07/18 00:12, David Marshall wrote:       > >>>> Out of 275 GRO format marriage certificates I have obtained, dating        > >>>> from 1838 to 1963, there is just one which only has a single witness        > >>>> recorded (in 1882).       > >>>> Was this legal? Does anyone else have an example?       > >>>> David       > >>>       > >>> I am pretty sure that only one witness to a wedding is not legal. A        > >>> soldier on active service can make a will without the required        > >>> formalities, but I have never heard of the same rule applying to        > >>> marriages.       > >>>       > >>> Did the other witness sign with a mark (a cross)?       > >> No, it was just left blank.       > >> It was a wedding in a parish church after banns and everything else is        > >> just as would be expected.       > >> David       > >>       > > According to the excellent book by Rebecca Probert, Marriage Law for        > > Genealogists (2012), failure to comply with the requirement for the        > > marriage registration to be attested by two witnesses was not one of the        > > matters stated (in the Marriage Acts 1753 and 1836) to make the marriage        > > void. Therefore the marriage was valid (see pages 82, 88 and 92 of that        > > book).       > >        > > However, if what you have is a certificate provided by the GRO, remember        > > that this is a copy of the copy sent by the Vicar to the Superintendant        > > Registrar. Mistakes can happen. It would be worth checking the parish        > > register to see whether a second witness appears there.       > >        > Thank you for that. The marriage was in Ewhurst and so the records ought        > to be in the East Sussex Record Office near Brighton. I have not been        > able to confirm this from a quick look at their website but if I have        > the opportunity to be in the neighbourhood I will check more thoroughly.       > David              Now in Brighton & Hove, not in Lewes.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca