Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    soc.genealogy.britain    |    Genealogy in Great Britain and the islan    |    130,039 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 128,616 of 130,039    |
|    A Lefevre to All    |
|    Eliza Maria, Family Tree    |
|    12 Aug 18 21:26:51    |
      From: lefev@freeuk.com               I wonder if we might have a bit of genealogy for a change?              A year or so ago Ancestry family trees had about a dozen which       included Eliza Maria       Lefever. They are down to three now, but are still wrong. Earlier       this       year, working with another searcher I traced Eliza Maria back another       two       generations, so perhaps this is a good time to put things right.               Eliza Maria Lefever was born 15 Sep 1854, Princes St Bethnal Green.       Baptised 8 Oct St Matthias. Her parents were William and Elizabeth.       This is       the first time I saw Elizabeth shown as Betsy. This wasn't the       Elizabeth       Hunsdon that everyone showed, she married the William who was born in       Yorkshire, they lived in Bethnal Green, no children and both died in       1863.              William and Elizabeth Kendrick were married 30 Oct 1845, All Saints       Stepney.       Elizabeth was born in Liverpool, the father of each was William. This       is       eight years after their first child was born.              William Francis born 27 Jan 1837 bapt 11 June St Leonard Shoreditch.       Isaac was the next, born 22 Mar 1839, birth registered, but no       baptism. I       assumed this is because their house at 4 Angel Alley was demolished at       that       time with a wide area, to clear the way for the railway to come down       from       Shoreditch to Liverpool St.       Next, David, born Dec 1841, Registered, but not baptised.       Next was Elizabeth Louisa, born 27 Nov 1843, not registered, but bapt       10 Dec       and died 23 Dec 1843. I assume this was "baptised in mortal danger."       James was next, registered Jun 1846 but no baptism       Then Charles Samuel born 25 Aug 1851, registered and baptised 14 Sep       1851,       St Matthias and died Sep 1852. Was this another "baptised in mortal       danger?"       No indication at this point who was William, the father.              In the general area there two other groups that I felt were connected       but       couldn't see how. There was a William, married Ann Crudgington 1810.       They       had one daughter the previous year and a second, Mary Ann in 1812.       Both       girls were baptised 1812 in St Leonard. That first daughter was Louisa       Deborah. That, to me, seemed to resonate with Elizabeth Louisa.               There was Ann Lefevre a widow, married David Baron 10 Apr 1823       They had 3 children, Hannah b. 1826, Thomas 1829 and Francis David, 21       Apr 1834       They were all baptised 13 July 1834        In her examinations in 1860 and 1861 she is Amelia Ann Barron, widow,       and       states her first Husband was William Lefevre and that his father was       David       Lefevre, a Master Tailor, who was passed from this parish (Bethnal       Green)       with three children to St Sepulchre, Newgate.              A David Lefevre married Lucy Harman 1773 in Cambridge       3 Children: Thomas 5 Apr 1775 Cambridge        Henry 28 Apr 1783 St Sepulchre        Ann 24 Aug 1785 St Sepulchre        A William Lefevre died 1819, aged 27 and is buried in Gibralter       Gardens, a       non-conformist burial ground. So born c.1792. No further sign of Lucy       so my guess       is that she died, and David just didn't arrange a baptism               A William Lefevre b.1815 and an Isaac b.1817are brothers, appeared at       the Old Bailey        Isaac was sent to Australia and William went to prison for six months               They fit in as the sons of William and Ann Crudgington.        It leaves a problem, if a man wasn't baptised was burial in church       grounds not allowed?        If a man was not baptised, could his sons not be baptised, but his       daughters could?               I've not found burials for any of William's sons. Isaac the informant       of death       was the doctor in the infirmary, not unusual, but this was 1 week       after death, when       there would normally have been a burial, as the family lived nearby       why not one of them?       There doesn't seem anything unusual about the death, bronchitis, he       had been in the infirmary previously for the same.                      Regards, Alec Lefevre              --       A Lefevre              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca